• ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Fuck. Vimeo is used by many filmmakers and streaming services, moving all of that content elsewhere will be downright impossible to carry out completely. A lot of content will be irrecoverably lost once the company is really killed off.

    Last year or so they disabled viewing other people’s profiles or even searching the website for users in the EU. I have to admit I haven’t seen any service being so actively destroyed by its owners.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      by its owners

      They have new owners, apparently.

      Seems to be a typical buyout into milking and eroding cycle.

  • MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Isn’t all of Dropout.tv hosted on Vimeo?

    Edit: yes it is

    “Do not build your own app. Vimeo’s right here. I don’t have to worry about customer service. I don’t have to worry about legal compliance… Our budget can go to what actually matters to us and what we’re actually good at, which is content."

    Andrew Bridgman, Chief Digital Officer at Dropout

    that might age poorly

    • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Other video hosting providers are available if it ever becomes a problem. I don’t think they will loose much sleep over this.

      • MurrayL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        True, it doesn’t seem like something that would kill the business. But still, I would think the prospect of migrating an entire streaming service to a completely different platform might warrant losing at least a little sleep.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        What you lose is audience. People often aren’t willing to replatform for a single creator.

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Whelp, hopefully federated video sharing gets the momentum it needs to compete with YT. Seems like it’s the only alternative that’ll be left.

  • Alb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not a good news both for users and creators.

    Price hikes coming… As usual with this company.

      • Broken@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Companies that want control over their videos. I.e. not to have ads play, not to have their videos followed by suggested content that sends viewers to competitors, nor have that alternate content show when the UI is paused or interacted with. It also allows updating of videos (whereas YouTube makes you upload a new video and you loose all links or view stats/momentum from the switch)

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Job postings don’t necessarily mean that they’re actually hiring. Sometimes job postings are used to appear healthy in public.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          More often than you think. I‘ve seen some shocking claims about ghost job listings on LinkedIn. It’s estimated almost one out of four listings are made without the intend to hire someone.

          Of course you can be skeptical about these numbers so feel free to look up the term „ghost job listings“.

          However it does echo what many applicants have been complaining about for years. They apply and get turned down immediately with company claiming they already filled the position or that applicants didn‘t meet some absolutely ridiculous criteria. Meanwhile the job listing stays up for months or even years. Doesn‘t take a genius to realize that listing was never serious and they only did it for research.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Companies don’t stop hiring, at least in tech. They can force out more expensive talent and hire in cheaper areas or get more junior talent. You could very well interview your potential replacement.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What makes you say that? The Business Insider source from the comments on the linked page doesn’t talk about AI at all. But describes how they were bought, by a firm that does this cycle of buy and layoff.

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Because they’ve titled their home page as such. Here’s what I see when I search.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does Vimeo own their own their own infrastructure, or just lease streaming storage from AWS/Google/Whomever?

    If the former, it could be a good takeover target.

    • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Your logic is sound, but Bending Spoon is not know to care about value. If Vimeo owns any infrastructure, they’ll sell at it at ebay.