Warning: This story contains some offensive language

So-called spy-cam porn has existed in China for at least a decade, despite the fact that producing and distributing porn is illegal in the country.

But in the past couple of years the issue has become a regular talking point on social media, with people - particularly women - swapping tips on how to spot cameras as small as a pencil eraser. Some have even resorted to pitching tents inside hotel rooms to avoid being filmed.

[…]

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Didn’t read the whole article but first thought - he was fine viewing others but upset when he was filmed?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Not to disregard the issue, but the ISI does the same thing to generate blackmail.

    Although considering the epstein files, that almost seems tame in comparison.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The theory is to detect infrared light for the cam who utilise infrared night vision, but from the article it seems that they don’t use that at all, so when the light’s out no one can view anything. This might be the reason why it went undetected.

      • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s one method, also camera sensors have a retro-reflective effect that makes using a camera flash highlight other cameras in its field.

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I suppose you could theoretically utilize the flash functionality in an attempt to catch some sort of glare/reflection back from the hidden camera’s lens… maybe? This is just a guess, however, tbh, and I have my doubts of its efficacy against the borderline frighteningly tiny lenses in use on more modern equipment that is designed specifically to be hidden. The pricier gear could (potentially) even utilize special coatings or treatments intended to mitigate such a detection method for that matter, as there’s clearly no shortage of money surrounding the… “industry,” for lack of a better term.

      I certainly wouldn’t consider it a reliable test, that’s for sure