AmidFuror

“apart” has almost an opposite meaning to “a part” in this context, though “apart from” would make more sense than “apart of.”

How does it compare to CT scans? Asking for a friend.

Shirley Jackson didn’t write any stories about towns where nothing happens. Survival of the fittest twist.

My girlfriend woke up last night to find an anaconda on her leg.

Yes, she mocks me for calling it that.

Anything from mozzies to Ozzies.

You only bang married couples or what?

I would prefer to read only news sources that support the actions of autocratic regimes if their government is mostly run by non-whites.

Something like this?

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/de/83/4e/de834eb42e0b2f38a62c64e9b8d9f961.jpg

Now that you’ve realized the pride’s arrived, we got to pump the stuff to make us tough.

What we need is to concentrate power into the hands of a single benevolent ruler with absolute authority. I suggest Winnie the Pooh.

It was an “experiment” in the same sense that Mengele was doing medical experiments. Fines and penalties on paper; forced abortions and sterilizations in practice.

I believe credit for the first occurrence goes back to Ferdinand Magellan. Although he himself did not have the procedure, his crew did after his death in 1521.

This is a tricky debate, with mostly religious and traditionalist people on one side, and people against unnecessary surgical procedures on the other. Either way, I think once the foreskin is removed, it should be treated as medical waste.

Concious

I still have my eye out for the return of sister-fetish dude.

https://fedia.io/m/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world/t/1055567/How-do-I-deal-with-feelings-towards-my-sister-Genuine

Gotta love science reporters. “Thought to be impossible.”

“A 747 jet took off from New York’s Kennedy airport this morning, accomplishing a feat once thought to be impossible.”

This is definitely BeReady77 with a new persona back after a year of inactivity.

https://lemmy.world/post/13802343 https://lemmy.world/post/13802836 https://lemmy.world/post/15732973 https://lemmy.world/post/15756549 https://lemmy.world/post/18283806 https://lemmy.world/post/18284009

When your result breaks the laws of physics, you need to check your measurements and maths just to be sure. Better yet, have others do it for you.

Exactly. You could preface your prompt with something like this:

In answering the following questions, don’t use bullet points or emdashes, and be very concise.

And then you just paste the text from the post title and subsequent body below that. Then you make a top-level comment with ChatGPT’s output answering the poster’s questions.

Somewhere else in the comment section you could reveal your methodology.

There is no reliable way to tell whether a story was written by a human or an AI based on the final text alone. Current detection tools are inconsistent and can be wrong in both directions.

Drafts can offer some context, but they are not proof, since AI-generated text can also be produced in stages or edited to look human. Posting a draft and editing it live may demonstrate effort, but it still cannot conclusively prove authorship.

Because of this, most platforms focus on disclosure and rules about acceptable use rather than trying to definitively verify whether a text was written by a human or an AI.