• JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can double check it but I think solar is cheaper now. I was shocked as well, I thought nuclear was the cheapest still.

    • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      But solar is unreliable. Night day, snow cover, dust cover. It also has to be local and supplemented by other sources

      • spartanatreyu@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        But solar is unreliable.

        Which is why you add storage and wind to the mix. Overproduce energy when it’s available and store the leftovers for when you under-produce.

        At this point, saying Solar doesn’t work at night is kind of like saying cars don’t work without wheels. No one is getting solar without storage, just like no one is driving a car without wheels.

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Yep, the unreliability is exactly why buying from 100% green energy providers is more expensive than buying from natural gas providers. Batteries are extremely expensive, natural gas is cheap.

        Source: Several of my friends live in states with energy provider choice; the green providers cost more.