• Heikki2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Nothing says pro life than killing anyone who receives an abortion, even if the abortion is to save the life of the mother which is the case for: Preeclampsia/Eclampsia, Placenta Previa/Accreta, Previable PPROM, Cardiac/Renal Disease, and Ectopic Pregnancy

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I see where you fucked up: you were looking for a conservative position to have any sort of internal logical consistency.

      • Heikki2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They say that but upto the doctors to prove its medically necessary to avoid lawsuits by the state. This delay is killing people. the politicians that rally for religious freedom and against sharia law, really like to impose theirs on others.

      • HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The less obvious fucked up part is how do you suppose they determine whether an exception was met? Do you think that is happening before the law enforcement goons have access to personal medical data?

        Almost certain that at the very least, having a medically necessary abortion will get your private health records turned over to the police. You will become an investigation target and have your privacy violated before they can even possibly know whether you fall under an exception. Mix in the general disposition of police and the specific conflicting interest of stalker/abusive cops who will have no motivation to protect the people in these situations and you have a system designed to put every pregnant person in the US in the sights of PD firearms.