• zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This is especially good news since Motorola makes some of the few phones with a headphone jack. I just hope that whatever phone they make isn’t some nearly 7" behemoth like their current line.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      At this point you HAVE to make it a 7" behemoth to get sales, but a lower-volume model with a smaller screen would be a great addition to the lineup. But I can’t imagine too many people buy them because Apple stopped making the Minis and they don’t usually stop making things that make them money. I actually loved my 13 mini. If this Motorola-GrapheneOS partnership ends up spawning a phone of that size (I do think a lot of privacy enthusiasts may also be smaller phone enthusiasts), I may finally go back to Android.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Xperia still sells. Mine is a bit over 5".

        Edit: ok, sells not that good. Why? Mine often gets jealous glances in public transport. Fits nicely in hand and pocket.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Xperia is massively overpriced, full of bloatware, trash software, 2 years of software updates, and they’re absolutely massive. And not just massive but like, insanely tall. Hard to believe they’re still around while LG has called it quits.

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Well, I’m not even asking for a true “mini” phone at this point, because we both know that would be asking too much. I just would just be happy with something like a 5.5-5.7" phone with a resolution that isn’t insulting (looking at you Librem 5) and some halfway decent storage. If the Moto collab phone doesn’t end up being viable for me due to size or other factors, I’ll live. My current Pixel should be supported on GrapheneOS for a good while, so I can hold out. I’ve already moved to using a DAP for listening to music because I couldn’t get a decent phone with a headphone jack anymore. Maybe one of the linux phones will be viable as a daily driver by then.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I mean that IS mini. The iPhone 13 mini, considered a tiny phone by most people, had a 5.4" screen.

          I of course remember thinking my 5.0" Moto G (2nd gen) was a huuuge ass slab compared to my previous phone lol

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I’ll never forget carrying around my Galaxy Note 2 and this guy asked me if it played DVDs LOL

          • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I got my Nexus One out the other day and it still booted. The screen is 3.7", it’s hilarious that it felt like a large phone at the time.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Fucking finally. The only reason I couldn’t get my hands on GrapheneOS is due to having to buy a Pixel which, wherever I look, would be around $400-$500 for something that they themselves admit would likely only get around 7 years of support.

    I can’t spend that kind of money right now. I need something below $300 and if possible, below $200.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Honestly, $400-$500 for 7 years of support is a killer deal. 5 years ago the only manufacturer to give a meaningful amount of support was Apple, everyone else was up to 2, even for flagships.

      But I completely understand your situation, especially if you’re trying to be fiscally responsible and NOT get your phone on a payment plan of some sort. The 7 years of support means you might be able to find a 2 year old Pixel for below 300 though? Unless they don’t depreciate fast enough for that.

    • snowdriftissue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Unfortunately the first device from this partnership is unlikely to be cheaper than the a series Pixel lineup. The GrapheneOS team already confirmed it will have a flagship snapdragon SOC. Have you looked into used a series Pixel devices? The 8a can be had refurbished in the low $200 range, and it will have software support for 5 more years. The 9a can be had for about $250 and will receive 6 more years of updates.

  • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I look forward to using GrapheneOS on a phone with a MicroSD slot. Google and Apple (as examples) are always incorrect in their assumptions that “this amount of built-in storage is all you will ever need.”

    • Ruiner13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      No, they intentionally limit storage so they can sell cloud solutions and suck up more of your fungible personal data while you pay them.

  • 42beansinapod@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Anything but a mainstream brand!

    Pixels are stupid for GOS since the HW is mid at best and overpriced. If you are buying a phone to flash it anyway, the decision should be made only on hardware (and ability to flash)

    • snowdriftissue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      HW is mid at best and overpriced

      GOS has strict security requirements and so far Pixels have been the only devices out there that both allow GOS installation and meet their security requirements. Simple as.

      Personally apart from repairability, I see very little meaningful difference in phone hardware these days. And a series Pixels are very reasonably priced.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That’s good news. I hope it’s a budget device with a plastic case, SD card, IR emitter, notification LED, and headphone jack.

  • outbloodyrageous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Damn, that’s surprising. Motorola has never been known for a strong update policy, and having a good update schedule is one of the key requirements for GOS. I hope they are addressing this issue.

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      I thought the same initially, but Lenovo also owns the ‘Think’ line of products which have historically been targeted at business customers and known for security. Whilst neither of the ThinkPhones currently meet GrapheneOS requirements, Motorola has been improving in that regard (according to GrapheneOS). Motorola also recently released a phone with 7 years of security updates, which is unusual for them.

      Motorola, although it is now owned by Lenovo, is still headquartered in the US. North America continues to be one of its primary markets, and it’s the next biggest company there by market share after Apple, Samsung and Google. Micay is based in Canada AFAIK. Altogether it makes a lot of sense to me that Motorola would be the company to reach out, as opposed to another Chinese brand headquartered on the other side of the world with zero market share or presence in North America, or one with any prior reputation for security.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I mean it seems like a no-brainer for OEMs. You can just turn over all your software development to a 3rd party, for free.

    • lemmysmash@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I think this is exactly the win-win situation from this possible partnership: Motorola makes secure hardware and firmware patches, GrapheneOS takes care of the whole software security and timely updates (they already do).