• wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    While true about the vulnerability,

    Did the IQ measurements change or something? I thought 100 was considered fairly intelligent, but lately I’ve seen multiple comments indicating that it’s a lukewarm average and anything less is unintelligent.

    People use “room temperature IQ” as an insult, but I thought 70-80 was average and there’s really no need for concern until you get below 60.

    Also, from what I can remember, IQ was calculated as some function of one’s “mental age” relative to their “actual age,” so it really doesn’t mean anything beyond one’s mid-twenties. It functioned mainly as an indicator of intellectual development among youths, relative to their peer group. And 80-90 would have meant you were above average…

    • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Trump is probably around 80, for reference.

      I agree with the criticisms below about methodology; IQ is ultimately a measure of how good you are at those particular tests. And multiple skillsets are tested. But it is valuable when you’re talking about general trends or having a concrete point of comparison (for example, a certain individual compared to the general population).