• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The woman seems like a long time fraudster\con artist\not trustworthy person.

    The more telling thing from this is that there’s a massive amount of documents that they refuse to release, and that they released the one document of this woman talking about Epstein to the FBI, they didn’t release the other 3 documents that were right along with it that had her talking about Trump. This is pretty hard evidence (as if it weren’t obvious) that the documents not released were very intentionally hiding documents that implement Trump, and likely many other people they wanted to keep illegally protected. That’s the real story.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        I should say allegedly, I suppose. There was enough information about ages and locations and stuff associated with the files that the woman may have been identified, and if it is that woman, her claims at face value would hold little weight due to her history.