• MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    all heirarchy is coercive.

    I’ve been in several bands that had non-coercive hierarchies. We just each knew what we were good at and did our things, and it worked great.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      That doesn’t sound like a heirarchy, if you can all just do your thing.

      If the manager or frontman tells everyone else what to do and you can’t decide for yourself or tell them what to do, that would be hierarchic.

        • Hegar@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Fun! Yeah i think that’s what graeber & wengrove would call “play heirarchy” - temporary, rotating or situational relations rather than the perminant domination of heirarchy.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            yup. there’s a few hand signs everyone knows so we all know whether to play the intro, bridge, solo, verse, chorus, ending, etc. if it’s your song, you lead it and you need to be responsive to the crowd. monty python caused us to call ourselves an anarcho-syndicalist commune but we just enjoyed the time we had together.