• hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because you have 2/4 general terms:

      1. Rideshare
      2. Short term rentals
      3. Crypto
      4. LLM
      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Rideshare” is also the least accurate term used to dodge regulations. It is just a taxi/cab. You are paying someone to get you from one place to another. They aren’t sharing their ride, they were never going where you are going before you told them to.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Taxis/cabs are legal. Also, perhaps because of age, I tend to view taxis and cabs as phone numbers you call for a car to show up (or go to a taxi stand), whereas I see rideshare as reserve via an app.

          I think ride share really just means a vehicle that is used not solely for commercial purposes

          • kevincox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            They are legal if you follow the regulations. The problem with the “rideshare” companies is that they don’t. We should just call them “unregulated taxis” rather than pretending that they are a different service. I think just about every taxi company these days is on some app or another (often the same that call unregulated cabs in countries that actually got their shit together and banned the unregulated ones).

            • Sabrinamycarpet@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I think just about every taxi company these days is on some app or another (often the same that call unregulated cabs in countries that actually got their shit together and banned the unregulated ones).

              I’d like to point out this probably would have taken another 10-15 years to achieve had it not been for the disruption of said ridesharing apps.

              • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Just because there’s a inconvenience for consumers doesn’t mean you make workers suffer instead of fixing the problem.

                • Sabrinamycarpet@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’m assuming/ hoping you mean the taxi drivers when you say workers.

                  I empathize with anyone who’s livelihood is affected by changes in society. But stagnating progress because someone somewhere will be negatively impacted only assures no progress will ever be made.

          • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I use a local cab company. They smartened up after getting crushed by uber in the first couple years of their existence. Now they have an app that’s similar to uber, but I just call and use the web link that shows me where the car is.

            It’s literally the same service, but I have to give my info to Uber’s app to get it.

    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Uber/Lyft

      Airbnb

      Apart from the recently added surge pricing, what else is illegal about these 2?