• Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    13 days ago

    Sounds like netgear routers are now 100% confirmed to be compromised with backdoors instead of just being probable

      • 𝕽𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑 𝕽𝖊𝖇𝖊𝖑@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Yep, but unfortunately it’s not always as straight forward as it may sound. Plus, with routers becoming more difficult to acquire, it’ll only get harder and harder to pull off. But there’s OpenWRT and dd-WRT that work with a pretty decent range of routers as well as ASUS Merlin for many ASUS routers. Then, if you want to get nerdy with it and build your own router from an old computer, there’s OPNsense and pfSense. Eventually it’ll come down to these two if the ban is longterm and you want any semblance of obfuscation online…

        • whaleross@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          GL.iNet are flashable and come with their fork of OpenWRT out of the box. I run the latest regular OpenWRT on mine.

            • whaleross@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Just that it is FOSS without any black box binary blobs. It is stable and works great so why not.

              Edit: I don’t have anything against the custom fork.

              Edit 2: That it is supported in the mainline OpenWRT means it will be updated with security and features even if the custom fork is abandoned.

        • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yes, OPNsense is excellent if you have a spare computer to run it. Then you can repurpose your consumer router as a WiFi access point. I still feel safer flashing the old WiFi router with open firmware before using it even as a WAP.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I tried getting into the nerdy side. I have an old PC with only one NIC, but apparently it needs two in order to bridge to a WiFi AP? That makes sense, but I don’t have an old PC with two NICs. Also, my NIC doesn’t support as much bandwidth as I have supplied anyhow. Sad times.

          Edit: the desktop is old enough that the mobo doesn’t have the slots I need. Effectively, I have to get a new old burner PC. It’s an old ThinkCentre with a dvd player built in.

          • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            13 days ago

            If it’s a desktop PC you can buy a PCIe card with multiple Ethernet ports pretty cheap, especially if you buy used.

          • Well ya, you need at least two NICs to properly setup a firewall. Additionally, since NICs are the most crucial piece of hardware for routers and firewalls, it’ll only be as good as the hardware it runs on. Older NICs lead to regular crashes and/or slow network speeds. So swapping the original NIC out and adding another is VERY typical when repurposing old PCs as a router. The most common options for NICs I’ve seen are the Intel I350-T2 and I350-T4. Ironically, they cost about as much as a decent router, but going this route actually puts you in control of your home network!

        • MML@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          Great, now I just need everyone else to do this, I can have the greatest most rebust setup imaginable, what am I gonna use it for? To talk to the other two people with similar setups?

          • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            I assure you there are multiple people on this thread alone that have this setup. It’s not like you somehow can’t access the public internet once you’ve got a homemade router.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      That’s a great stock picture, I’m surprised I’ve never seen corruption represented visually like this before.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yes, but that would take work.

      This is tech journalism. If evidence connecting something can’t be Googled in 30 seconds, it’s just an area of speculation.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    13 days ago

    Two possible reasons:

    They agreed to installation of American spyware, probably not limited to models sold in the US, or they paid their dues to Trump, and he called the FCC.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 days ago

      Well netgear has a stellar reputation for screwing up their firmware horribly so if they are involved in implementing the implant it absolutely will be noticed.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Gonna be really funny when it’s revealed in 5 years that Netgear routers have a backdoor for the Chinese govt and the US okayed it because of the money the Trump admin got.

    It’s literally the type of corruption that was claimed China would do for the last 4 decades.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      …now see, you SAY funny. I think we have a difference of opinions on humor. You know what I find funny? You ever see that old video from the 90s of Donald Duck slumped down in his chair, getting a handjob from Daisey duck? And he can’t handle it. He’s all like “Ooooooweeeeee!!! Oh my gaaawwwwddddddd!!! Playin wit ma balls! Playin wit ma balls!!! Oooooooh!!!”

      And then he just cums EVERYWHERE, and it’s all drippy on Daiseys face. She’s just kneeling there, with a shocked look on her face, and Donald says “I’ll go get you a towel!”

      I found that funny. Not so much national corruption, bribery, and internet security fraud.

  • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 days ago

    I get the aching feeling its because Netgear likely agreed to some backdoor shit, or to just funnel all user traffic to ICE

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Netgear likely agreed to some backdoor shit

      If that’s how you win Trump’s favor, count me out forever.

  • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 days ago

    Is it because Netgear is a “US” company? Meaning they are on the US stock exchange, have corporate offices in the US, and manufacture everything in Asia?

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Did anybody ever confirm if standalone wireless access points are subject to this weird FCC ban thing? Because, like, you can make your own router out of an old computer.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 days ago

      I don’t think the FCC ban is really effective anyway. I was able to easily order a foreign-made router recently from the same reseller I’ve used in the past.

      Also even if they did police the retailers for router sales, I doubt anybody on eBay is going to give a shit so there will be lots of routers for sale there.

      • Klowner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 days ago

        The ban is on giving fcc license approval to new models, so stuff that’s out now can still sell

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      The FCC ruling prohibits the sale of new models of consumer router. It doesn’t forbid the continuing use of existing routers or, if I understand it right, the continued sale of models that were already on sale. So you can continue to use existing models as WAPs or routers. But when the tech and the security moves on the FCC wants the USA to be left behind.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      This is for devices sold, specifically new devices sold. Not the existence (or making of) and it only affects specifically consumer-grade devices sold explicitly for the consumer market. So it wouldn’t affect universities, homelabs, or any corporation.

      It is just a shake down for bribes to continue selling routers in the US, that’s it.