• Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a link to a specific page of the book “American Holocaust: The Conquest of the New World” By David Sannard. It’s not a Google doc.

    • rug_burn@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And it’s written by a person, with an agenda and bias just like everyone else. Have a tough time taking anything seriously from someone affiliated with Ward Churchill.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The book is well sourced with tons of evidence. If you can invalidate their evidence, I am happy to hear. Otherwise, please drop this discussion. It’s not a good look.

        • rug_burn@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Citing one book by someone with a clear agenda isn’t a good look either. You picked the fight, feel free to drop it at your leisure.

          • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            someone with a clear agenda

            Source? Prove to me that this author cannot be trusted. Otherwise your claim is to be ignored, sorry.

            • rug_burn@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You don’t have to apologize to me. If he’s someone who would collaborate with Ward Churchill, he’s got a clear agenda. My source for that was looking him up on Wikipedia, as I had no clue who he was. I’m not going to do the effort of sending you a direct link to the article, so feel free to do it yourself. And grant us all the fact that someone who writes a book has an implied agenda to sell the book.

              And every time you start a post with “Source?”, it’s a bad look.

              • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                “every time you start a post with “Source?”, it’s a bad look”

                this is what you look like saying that

                • rug_burn@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Clever.

                  I’m going through the sourced materials in the American Holocaust book, (great title, by the way! not divisive at all!), and considering the sources, it’s pretty obvious Stannard has an agenda, he’s a “cultural materialist”, an offshoot of cultural Marxism. But you knew that, you just didn’t think I’d look 😉

                  Anyway, with as far as I’ve gotten, I can surmise the sources, the majority of them at least, point to textbooks published by “Berkley; University of California press”. Seems a lot of anti-American sentiment comes out of Berkley. Just to appease my curiosity, I’m going to look deeper into this fellow, who, funny enough, cites his own works as well. That’s pretty douchey

                  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.mlM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Thanks for being open minded and reading through! Even if it’s through a biased eye and a bit of a snarky reply, I still appreciate it. I hope that you open up and consider the sources presented with an open mind.

                    I’ll be looking forward to your assessment when you’re done, and I’ll do my best to receive it with an open mind as well.