return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoLeak Shows ICE Planning to Use Facial Recognition Glasses to Identify Targets in Real Timefuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1453arrow-down14cross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmy.mlworldnews@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1449arrow-down1external-linkLeak Shows ICE Planning to Use Facial Recognition Glasses to Identify Targets in Real Timefuturism.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square62fedilinkcross-posted to: world@lemmy.worldnews@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmy.mlworldnews@lemmy.ml
minus-squarecrandlecan@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·5 days agoAs long as they kill p. of c., it’ll be deemed legal 🫡🤢
minus-squareempireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·5 days agoTheir “facial recognition” ends up just being a binary switch on a light detector
minus-squareLost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·5 days agoTook me waaaaay longer than it should have to realize “p. of c.” means “people of color”. Still haven’t figured out if you’re censoring it, or if you think p. of c. is a faster way to abbriviate it. Either way, that “shorthand” is stupid, and you should just write it out.
As long as they kill p. of c., it’ll be deemed legal 🫡🤢
Their “facial recognition” ends up just being a binary switch on a light detector
Took me waaaaay longer than it should have to realize “p. of c.” means “people of color”.
Still haven’t figured out if you’re censoring it, or if you think p. of c. is a faster way to abbriviate it.
Either way, that “shorthand” is stupid, and you should just write it out.