• loics2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because the performance of brave lib is a little better since it doesn’t go through the plugin API

      • b34k@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        So should you use this now? Or keep uBlock origin? Or enable both for maximum protection?

      • polle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is it? Like YouTube is less laggy with that? Thats the only situation where i see actual delays by adblocking

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, it is. No, the delays on Youtube don’t come from the performance of the adblocking code, so you won’t notice many differences. But more efficient adblocking is good for everyone - noticeably more so on devices with batteries, but still helpful for everyone.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I use brave as my YouTube browser and it does seem to perform better than Firefox with unlock. There’s frequently weird delays with Firefox where the ads get through a little and are then blocked(admittedly I probably only update it like once a month). I don’t get that with Brave.

          • polle@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I never experienced that, only youtube is lagging hard. How much ads you still get probably depends on your location. I dont see any with ublock.