Highlight:

“I have ordered a complete siege on the Gaza Strip. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed,” Gallant said. “We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They never weren’t, but they at least had the decency to pretend like they weren’t before.

      • QHC@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, so war crimes are justified as long as the other side does it first?

      • ???@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes but this particular news story is about Israel publicly announcing a war crime.

        • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Murder is against the law in western countries but of someone tries to kill you, you can kill them in self defense.

          So yea of someone is committing war crimes against you, you can fo ahead and fight back to get them to stop

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      so wait. Siege is a war crime? Not taking a side, I’m just a technicalities kind of guy. Its not like locking people in a house. And don’t hostage negotiators do just that in the US? (Could be just on tv). But it’s a big place. Fuel and electricity are nice to haves. They should have some amount of food and water stored up. And the southern border is with egypt, so I assume they can’t actually do anything about that. Doesn’t seem like a straight up war crime. But I have never read yhe definitions they have at the UN.

        • wwaxen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I just took a gander at the list as a refresher, and it is not 100% a war crime. You can argue this is an unjustified or excessive attack on civilians, but a judge may rule that is is required to defend against the enemy (Hamas).

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Item 2.b.25 from the list seems to match up:

            "Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; "

            • Iceblade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Is the intent to starve civilians or to deprive hamas combatants of any and all supplies?