Assuming the user will not be connecting over vpn, but is both remote and non-technical, how would you expose Jellyfin to them securely?

    • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      How do you get apps through something like that? Do you have to open your browser and hit the URL periodically to handle auth there and it just remembers your IP?

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can set pangolin to allow access to an entire resource or just certain paths without the front auth, instead relying on the built in auth.

        Your random plex/emby/jellyfin server isn’t going to be a huge target and the built in auth is good enough for the limited access your media system should have.

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wait so if you’re gonna allow access without authentication then why bother putting pangolin in front of jellyfin? Does it help in some other kind of way? I don’t really get how it helps without interfering with apps accessing jellyfin.

      • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Would you need to? Are apps a viable vector in? Basic auth in front of web ui does make sense though.

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What do you mean viable? The web UI is just an app that is delivered to your browser, it makes more or less the same API requests as an app would make, so IDK why the risk would be lower with an app?

          If an attacker can access the login endpoint for example to brute force or dictionary attack, it doesn’t matter if the web UI is or isn’t accessible if the login endpoint it uses is exposed for an app. The attacker could serve their own copy of the web UI and proxy requests to the API your app connects to. Blocking the html from being served doesn’t make a difference.

            • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s exactly the point I’m getting at. Putting an auth wall doesn’t work with many apps, and if you add exceptions to the API then you’re not really protecting anything.