• finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ah yes, Cortana and Copilot both suck, but surely third time’s the charm. And when Scout is, inevitably, unpopular as well? We’ll see what they call number four.

    • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Is there any fundamental difference between Copilot and Scout, or is it just a straight up rebranding?

      • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        My impression is that scout is specifically going to be an agentic ai. Agentic ai platforms are supposedly a little more competent than chatbots, but still subject to the same llm chicanery and enormous energy usage.

        It’s hard to compare against copilot because MS has called a ton of distinct things copilot (see the diagram below).

        diagram of different MS products called copilot

    • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cortana was actually really good on Windows Phone but they dumbed it down and added all sort of crap to it by the time it was integrated onto the desktop. They could’ve doubled down on whatads it good but nope.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Not sure why that had to come on automatically at maximum volume every time, but the number of times I’ve finished backing up and re-imaging a computer at 3 AM, on to have her start hollering at the exact moment my head hits the pillow, is too damn many

  • kablez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 months ago

    My non Linux savvy spouse is currently dual booting Linux Mint because Windows has become so frustrating to use.

    Mint isn’t perfect. We’ve run into a few bugs and shortcomings. But there’s a big difference between dealing with genuine issues in an OS and using one that feels actively hostile and designed to exploit the user.

    If both experiences can be frustrating, why choose the one that’s frustrating by design (unless you absolutely have to) ?

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah every time I get on my laptop it’s a little more unrecognisable and unusable to me. Will be getting in Linux as soon as I get a chance.

      • magnue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve strongly enjoyed cachyOS. Cue downvotes for this, but I installed ClaudeCode (any other cli would work fine too like opencode etc) and gave it a persistent memory as an OS helper of sorts when I get stuck.

        Probably moronic to quit windows over AI integration and then set up Linux with the exact same vision just in a completely custom way.

        • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve just started messing around with cachy after using mint for a month and a bit, honestly kinda liking it with KDE over mint now.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    We’re going to MAKE people ADDICTED by making a REALLY Good Product! SOLVING annoying Problems! TREATING Customers respectfully! FORCING ourselves Onto people like Donald Trump on Little Girls!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they want people addicted to an AI, it’s going to have to be a lot better than fucking Copilot.

    As slop generators go, it’s about the sloppiest.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Have they tried making it better, I feel like I’m more likely to become addicted to it if it was good.

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    No shit, Sherlock.
    And people would actually happily get addicted to an AI assistant which is reliable, safe, capable, kind, and fast.
    They really should try making a great product. Then they don’t need any tricks. People love great products.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      And local and under your control. As a “second brain” that isn’t sentient but intelligent to assist you AI has great potential. In a few years we’ll probably have the models and new hardware to run good enough models locally on cheap enough hardware.

      But by then they’ll have drummed enough support for “muh copyright” to buy legislation for AI licensing and make all AI models have to pay a license fee to… “someone”. Like that poor writer who had his work illegally read by an AI. So then no open source models can exist and they have the monopoly. Big win for the little guy lol.

      • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The answer to “copyright” overreach is just piracy. I can play pirated games, watch pirated movies, listen to pirated music… Of course, I will be able to just use a pirated model locally. Or I can just use a Chinese or Russian one - they can speak English just fine.