• ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Good” news is that AI companies killed the gaming upgrade market, so studios will need to target the same hardware for a while. We might even see the come back of the smart tricks to go beyond the hardware limits era.

      • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I tried playing on Amazon Luna and it was a buggy laggy mess, even for a single player “offline” only game.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Because they are mainly producing components for datacenters, which will be used for cloud computing. Only consumergrade hardware is overpriced.

          • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Only consumergrade hardware is overpriced

            Well no, the memory price increase is specifically here to price gouge AI datacenters. If you’re running a non-AI datacenter, and if you’re targeting consumers, like with remote desktop gaming, you have AI-like costs (literally, since servers GPUs are gaming GPUs), but without the enterprise customers. Oh and you also need the best bandwidth possible, because a few added milliseconds might make the “remote” use unbearable, which is an added cost datacenters don’t have to deal with on the same terms.

            • Rothe@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              That is prety irrelevant since consumers aren’t the customers for AI datacenter hardware, rich megacorporations with unlimited VC capital are.

              • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Well yes, megacorps have unlimited budget for AI datacenters, that’s my point; consumer facing offerings don’t, such as cloud gaming, and they’re competing for the same price-gouged resource (“competing” is too generous tbh, consumer facing companies are getting curb stomped)

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There is no probably about it. Jensen Huang has talked about nothing else (besides AI) for quite some time now.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      the gaming upgrade market was kinda ridiculous anyway.

      We dont need new, more powerful GPUs every 12/16 months

      GPUs should, like, a new GPU every 5 years at a bare minium. New Cards being churned out every year is why gaming is shit, because theres no time for devs to learn, to optimize…instead they just target apis and get it out, and tell us use DLSS/FSR3 if performance is shit, even at 1080p there are still games they expect us to use stupid ass scaling to make playable.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah. Console optimization used to be a real thing they should bring to PCs. Tomb Raider 2013 and Battlefield 3/4 on the Xbox 360 managed visuals and performance that an equivalently-speced PC from 2005 wouldn’t have been anywhere close to handling.