• manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    My “favorite” is when you get a rent increase despite overall dropping rents. The landlord would rather risk vacancy AND lower rent from the next tenant for the pure joy of inconveniencing you with a move.

    • Tanoh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I lived at a place many years ago, and the landlord wanted to increase the rent from 900 to 1300. Which was just a fantasy number for the area. I countered with 1000, because moving is a hassle and it was an ok place. They said no, so we moved.

      Then the place was vacant for years afterwards. I always chuckled when I walked past it. Great job, instead of getting a steady income, you try to gouge your tenant and get nothing! Art of the deal level right there.

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Whilst for some it might just be the inertia of “I increase the rent every year”, for many it will be a careful calculation, assuming that staying in the same place has an increasing value to you over time. It also helps with the overall dropping rents “problem” by helping to increase the average, and encourage other landlords to do the same.

      • ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m not convinced that landlords’ collusion to fix the cost of rent is the “careful calculation” that you’re describing. From my perspective, it’s quite the easy choice for them to extract more money instead of less money.

        I only potentially benefit from an overall market reduction in rent (which rarely occurs) if I move to a new apartment because they refuse to negotiate a lease renewal at a lower rate.