Just blocked lemmy.ml from my Lemmy account, and I swear to god it’s one of the best things I’ve ever done on this platform. My homepage feels actually clean now.

For the past few months I’d been seeing a lot of tankie posting and pretty much far-left propaganda on my feed. It got tiring enough that I finally checked my blocked-user list, and realized pretty much everyone I’d blocked was from lemmy.ml. So I just blocked the whole instance instead.

Saying this as someone who considers themselves a leftist: I used to think Lemmy itself was an echo chamber. Turns out lemmy.ml was the problem the entire time. Probably the reason I tolerated it for so long is that I agreed with a lot of what they posted, but like an oversaturated meme, I’d had enough. Browsing the platform was starting to feel way too tiring instead of fun, which defeats the point of being here in the first place.

The breaking point was seeing some dude post a “meme” implying North Korea and China are basically communist utopias and that the West sucks. I mean, the West does suck, but come on - you’re saying North Korea is the ideal the West should strive for? What the hell…

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Try talking about Nato expansion and see how far you get.

    The government doesn’t care if you hate it as long as you confirm the narrative with your hate.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      What expansion?

      The latest new members of NATO after many years have applied because Russia invaded ukraine, a non-NATO country.

      If there weren’t countries invading other ones, no one would need to join NATO, as it is a defensive alliance.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        What expansion?

        Russia says that they were promised no Nato expansion in Eastern Europe like there was a commitment to no Nato troops in East Germany.

        If there weren’t countries invading other ones, no one would need to join NATO, as it is a defensive alliance.

        How can countries protect themselves if they are attacked by Nato or Nato countries?

        • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          It’s the right of every country to join military alliances as they want. And some promise back in the early 90s is totally nothing binding that is valid when one country is actively attacking its neighbors. Every neighbor state will then try to get into an alliance against such aggression.

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          They can defend themselves the same way as if any other country attacked them.

          NATO doesn’t protect you if you start an offensive war. It only protects you if you’ve been attacked first.

          There’s no better example than the epstein-US-Iran war. Trump keeps whining that his “NATO allies” are not helping him. Iran right now can attack the US as much as it can, since the US started the war for no fucking reason.

          Some individual countries that are part of NATO have helped the US, but that was independently of NATO.

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            The US are using the bases of their Nato partners for Iran. It’s not a Nato mission in name but that doesn’t matter to Iran. If Ukraine gets Nato bases with fighter jets and midrange missiles then it doesn’t help Russia if Nato doesn’t attack but only the USA from bases in Ukraine.

            • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              The US are using its bases in allied countries to attack Iran. It is not named a NATO mission because it isn’t. The NATO alliance does not require it’s members to let the US use the military bases in their countries.

              For example, Spain, a member of NATO, did not allow the US to use the military bases located in Spain to attack Iran.

              The US has many allies. Some in NATO, and some outside NATO. Even if the US exited NATO, it could still use the bases in allied countries.

              It does matter to Iran if it is a NATO mission or not. Because since it is not, it doesn’t have to fight against the entirety of NATO.

              The US cannot use military bases it does not own or in foreign territory without permission. If there were “NATO military bases” in Ukraine, It would need the permission of NATO and Ukraine to use such base. NATO would presumably not grant permission to use it for an offensive war, as it is a defensive alliance.