• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    that they simply can’t bring themselves to vote for anybody breaking those principles.

    But what if by not voting or voting for someone who literally cannot win you are helping someone who makes it clear they will violate the principles you hold dear even more flagrantly? Because that’s what happened.

    One or the other WILL win. So do you help as much as you can or do you sit in a corner and cry?

    I honestly don’t feel bad about blaming the people that chose to sit in a corner and cry. Especially because their decision to do so affected a whole lot more than genocide on the other side of the planet.

    isn’t a Moral High Ground

    For me it isn’t a moral high ground. It’s making the decision that is BEST for my country AND the people in Gaza and wondering why the people who chose to cry in a corner couldn’t do the same.

    it seems to me that the competent candidate who trully means to represent their voters would move towards what voters want

    Geopolitics isn’t some simple thing. Should a candidate run on abandoning an ally when a subset of their voters don’t like that country anymore? Especially if they aren’t sure that those voters represent enough of the total to cost them the election? And when a lot of their voters still do want to be allies with that country?

    Turns out a lot of people can’t see the forest for the trees.