- cross-posted to:
- technology@beehaw.org
- cross-posted to:
- technology@beehaw.org
You must log in or register to comment.
The FTC is only doing their job because it affects the rich more than the poor
My guess is someone with enough money or proximity to power got gouged and bitched about it.
How long until someone figures out how to artificially generate cookies that result in you getting the lowest price?
Bull. Fucking. Shit. If anything, this was something Lina Khan started, and Trump forgot to cancel.
The story and headline are pushing a narrative that hides what is happening.
The FTC made sure we didn’t call it “surveillance pricing” and shifted from prevention to disclosure.
https://prospect.org/2026/08/21/ftc-says-it-will-enforce-surveillance-pricing-it-wont/
I didn’t get that it’s hiding anything. says it right there in the blurb:
The agency said it cannot ban personalized pricing under its current authority, but it will pursue enforcement action against companies that fail to meet its disclosure requirements.
Unless I’m missing something, I understood that to mean exactly what you said.
They are going to “enforce” disclosure rules but not enforce to prevent the substantive harms of surveillance pricing. It’s framed (and many stories and readers and commenters run with the narrative) that it’s a restriction, when it’s actually a permission. This means that unlike the direction Lina Khan’s FTC was taking to prevent surveillance pricing, it is saying to companies, “It’s fine to surveillance price as long as you disclose.” Meaning, open season.
It’s the difference between, for example, enforcing actual net neutrality versus enforcing “disclosure” about violating net neutrality.
It’s even right in the dek: Businesses must disclose if they use consumer data to set individual prices.
Did they even read the article?
And didn’t Delta announce that they were going to do just that.
And they are specifically excluded from the crackdown for some reason
That should be super illegal.
Should be, but it’s not. It’s discrimination, but discrimination is perfectly legal as long as it’s not done on the basis of one of the handful of protected classes (race, sex, religion, etc.)
No. It is super illegal but didn’t you know that as long as you tape a sign that says “digital” or equivalent on an illegal thing, is suddenly a new thing and can’t be handled with the current rules. Everyone knows that! It’s why we have illegal taxis, hotels, and spy networks all in the palm of your hand. Isn’t the future great?
deleted by creator
Of course the maga FTC head shut down public comments and RFI related to this very thing.
I wonder how much that chucklefuck profited off of this move.
He will take bribes to hand out exceptions, I guarantee it
Be careful all hotels and Trivago. We’re on to you.
