• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    The entire fucking point of the Web was to make information as easily-accessible as possible, structured and semantically tagged, and consumable by humans and further machine transformation alike. “Scraping” is facilitated by design!

    Using Javascript to deliberately break that is evil and every programmer who participates it is a piece of shit. No exceptions.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That’s true but they probably didn’t account for AI data scrapers ramfucking your server so they could steal all the value you assembled for general consumption and serve it themselves for profit.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        The scraping wouldn’t be a problem if Reddit simply provided an RSS feed or other data-efficient API. The “ramfucking” is caused by the attempt to block bots; it is entirely self-inflicted.

        Remember, it’s all our content to begin with and Reddit does not have any right to try to lock it up for itself.


        That doesn’t mean I like all the AI bullshit going on, BTW. But the problem is the generation of the slop, not the data accessibility.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          The scraping wouldn’t be a problem if Reddit simply provided an RSS feed or other data-efficient API

          That’s simply not true. These bots are essentially DDOSing the entire internet, API or not.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Okay, if efficient APIs existed and they weren’t incompetently failing to use them, it wouldn’t be a problem. Happy now?

            (I should’ve addressed that in my previous comment, as I was aware of how one of the Lemmy instances was taken down by scrapers the other day despite the fact that they could easily get all the content simply by consuming ActivityPub directly. But I was naively hoping it wouldn’t be necessary because, as you can see from this text, it would’ve cluttered up my writing with double the words.)

        • Toga77@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          But we all know AI companies are unethically scraping and selling shit back to us right? I just really need people to acknowledge that.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            It is the “selling shit back to us” specifically, not the “scraping,” that’s the unethical part. If the AI companies were doing the same scraping (and destructive rare book scanning, for that matter), but were using the data to populate archive.org, would it still be a problem? I would argue “no.”

            • Tim_Bisley@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think it would be a problem because the scrapers are hammering all types of websites from small forums to reddit with tens of thousands of unique ip addresses at a time. Websites that have neither the money, hardware, or protection had to figure out solutions really quick or suffer what is essentially a constant ddos attack. This is the reality of the web now, it’s just an incredibly hostile place.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is because appending site: reddit.com to a search query is basically a surefire way to find results written by genuine humans.

    The article is from 2026, not 2016? That bot-ridden Reddit? Am i in the wrong film?

  • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reddit seems to be in the business of extracting as much value as it can from said forums without completely destroying them.

    I call bs. It’s been completely destroyed for a while.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They are in the business of attracting new users into their new algorithmic engagement hellhole now. Show any propensity of interest, and you will get sidetracked to the most godawful side-communities that seem to have emerged to engage as many victims as possible. They do not want to focus on their old users as anything less than the content they already made that makes reddit show up as free advertisement to their new base in search engines. It’s all a game of “it’s the algorithm’s fault so you can’t blame us” now.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree with you. But what’s important is if they can sell anything. They destroyed their own product but they’re still pretending it has value, and maybe they can fool some investors into paying for script and AI slop.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      While I agree, More celebs than ever have been asking for comments and ideas on their reddit pages.

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 month ago

    If you consider scraping a threat then yes plain HTML might as well be giving up. The advantage of new reddit for that is quite clear: they can collect a bunch of data about your browser before deciding if you are a bot and if the rest of the page should load. The embedded recaptcha call in the screenshots is a pretty good hint. I suspect blocking trackers on new reddit will break as soon as the scrapers move over.

    As for why they don’t just kill old reddit: a significant chunk of their active posters use it and are attached to it. So if they kill it entirely they will lose content. Posters are of course logged in so this change is less likely to affect them.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    How dare you question King Steven the Turd, Greediest of Pigboys? If he proclaims HTML to be unsafe, it must be so. That’s a King’s job, to tell the Landed Gentry how to behave…

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t even understand how there are still so many comments on that site. How is anyone even accessing it anymore? I just assume it’s 100% bots

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      The site is most hostile to visitors who aren’t logged in, and the users who comment probably mainly visit the site while logged in.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Nah I have been banned loads for insanely minor stuff. I got a sitewide ban having appealed a ban for some star trek opinion I cant remember.

        My account was eight years old with a decrnt history and contributions. They give mods too luch sway because mods are losers doing work for free.

  • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I now browse Wikipedia. Please don’t screw me over Wikipedia, I donated five bucks to one of your nags once.

    For anyone who doesn’t know, you can download Wikipedia and host it yourself! I got the top 50k version (~7G) on my RPI3 and now no matter what fuckery they pull or the government pulls, I’ve got a pretty decent source of general information.

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Could you share what you did to achieve this? I’ve been planning on doing just that, and have it auto-update every week or so (keeping the previous versions archived, of course) by using kiwix-serve for a static ‘.zim’ file and maybe a cron job for the auto-update. But if you have a better solution, I’d love to know. The deployment I am planning is kind of convoluted to be honest.

      • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No, that’s exactly what I did, I’m running kiwix-serve, but I’m not going to bother updating it because I’m really worried about information degrading now that fascists are basically calling the shots on everything (and WP’s jackboot co-founder has a hard on for it). If I feel enough time has gone by to warrant an update I’ll just do it manually.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I am currently pretty tapped out on all storage and backup drives but if I had space this post would have motivated me. Just sayin

      • HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        You run a server on a machine inside your house, it can be any computer on your local LAN/wifi, but it’s obviously best if it’s a machine that’s always on. I use a Raspberry Pi 3B+ (these can be had for about $50) that I have plugged into my wifi router and it’s running a little program called Kiwix-Server (free and open source). You download the WP file (it’s a huge single file with a .zim extension) and point the server to it and boom.

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yesterday, I visited new Reddit. No VPN, Chrome in incognito mode, so no extensions, clickedon a link directly from Google search. Got a message that my access was blocked for security reasons. Copied the link to Firefox (with uBO and a few privacy-centric extensions), changed it to old reddit (where I was already logged in), and it worked just fine. I found out that when Reddit kills old reddit, I won’t even have the choice to switch to the new one (not that I ever would) because I’d be blocked anyway.

    • gandalfthewhite@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      It works through Tor, by the way. I had the same experience can’t look at it but I can through Tor. They even have a .onion.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’ve already disabled old.reddit for me. That makes it unusable, and thank you, Reddit. I actually used a domain blocker to block reddit, but generally would still be tempted to peek. Now, that is no longer the case. I, for one, am wholly in support of Reddit’s new anti-advertising stance!

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I haven’t maintained my personal website in ages. That, of course, means it loads instantaneously, in comparison to all these Library of Congress websites.