• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yes.

    The government decided that children that young should be supervised. She failed to provide that supervision.

    The child coming back safe that time doesn’t count- it’s a dangerous world.

    • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      But they didn’t charge her with endangering him, that’s a different thing.

      Edit to add: And I suspect they didn’t because he was, self evidently, not in danger. So I remain confused about why this became an entire affair.

      • dermanus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Because prosecutors are elected in the US, they do all kinds of stupid things.

    • dermanus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The government decided that children that young should be supervised.

      And we all know that the government is always just and never gets it wrong.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        did I say the government was right?

        the good news here is that, as part of that government by means of voting, you can go and change yours.