• Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Counterpoint: Password Manager = One point of failure

    Multiple Strong Passwords that have to be changed every 3 months even to sign on to your cornerstore rewards program without a password manager? Guess you’re never accessing any account older than 3 months because you’ve forgotten th3 b1lli0n$ oF s+r0ng p4s5w0rds Y0u h4Ve cr3atEd!

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean yeah, the security benefit from being un-notable isnt negligible

    • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s…not a counterpoint.

      You can have strong authentication on your central password manager, and have an encrypted container protecting it.

      There is no logical argument against password vaults as a concept. There are bad implementations of specific password vaults, but a password vault is the answer for the highest possible password based security available in 2023.

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And figuring out which password managers to use is not a task which a lot of people know where to start, and it is STILL a single point of failure

      • RedditRefugee69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What makes it completely unusable for me is that I don’t have a single work computer I use. I have to bounce around computers at work, my personal phone, computer, work iPad, etc.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I have no idea about how to protect a password manager with an encrypted container.

        And to be honest with you, it’s not something I’m likely to do even if you do attempt to explain the 60 minute long $10 18-step process to me. Or however long it takes and whatever it costs.

        And really, for all my ignorant ass knows you could’ve just as well been encouraging me to get malware and I’d be none the wiser.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Okay and now let’s get into threat modelling and risk management.

      What is the purpose of a password manager? What are the possible threats against them, and what are those against singular passwords for services? What is the risk of each of those?

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Guys, before you argue with me, password security is something that EVERYONE in the 1st world has to deal with, not just tech nerds. If you need to grow up around computers or take a class for it to be a good form of security, its a shit form of security for the general public

        • 0xD@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          But you don’t?

          Password managers really are not hard to use. Also there’s stuff like the password manager built into iOS, for example, which you don’t even have to think about.

          My comment about threat modelling was that you do not seem to understand the purpose of password managers. A way bigger problem for the average person online is password reuse, not targeted attacks against password vaults. That is the problem they solve.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve had security fatigue for years now. I’m sure most of you have. I’ve written down so many usernames and passwords and it’s still not half of what I have, and to top it off, several of the written passwords are now wrong after obligatory password changes and I don’t remember the new ones.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    11 months ago

    Imagine a site telling you “Sorry, you can’t use asdf123 as your password: you’ve already used it on that other site”.

    • FakinUpCountryDegen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      It would be better if you had a local tool telling you that - one that you control and only exists on your personal devices, kind of like secure messaging platforms such as Signal.

      Another great later would be for all compromised passwords found in breaches to never be usable anywhere ever again, thus helping to thwart the most common form of breach we see today: credential stuffing.

    • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s not as far fetched as it sounds. Any website worth its salt will store your password as a hash, so if they started sharing the hashes with each other they could prevent you from reusing passwords without changing much security-wise

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just use a password manager, then you get the benefits of having a single password to remember without the security-related downsides.

    • Rubanski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I never got over the fact that I somehow need to trust to an absurdly high degree a proprietary software to store ALL my passwords. Is this really a good idea?

      • aicse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can use KeePass, but you’ll have to figure out a way to have your password vault available on other devices (can do it by using any cloud shares, i.e. GDrive). This way you’ll be in charge of almost every aspect of your passwords. But you’ll have to take care of backups and keep everything in sync.

      • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s the choice between trusting one company (or if you self host, trusting yourself) to have their security all in order and properly encrypt the password vault. Using one password for every site you use means that you have to trust each of those sites equally, because if one leaks your password because they have atrocious password policies (eg. storing it in plain text), it’s leaked everywhere and you need to remember every place you used it before.

        Good password managers allow audits, and do at times still get hacked naturally (which isn’t 100% preventable). Yet neither of these should result in passwords being leaked. Why? Because they properly secure your master password so it can’t be reverse engineered to plain text, and without the master password your encrypted password vault is just a bunch of random bytes. And even in the extreme situation it did, you know to switch to a better password manager, and you have a nice big list of all the places where you need to change your password rather than trying to remember them all.

        Human memory is fallible and we want the least amount of effort, because of that we usually make bad passwords. Your average site does not have their password security up to date (There’s almost a 0% chance not one of your passwords can be found here). If you data is encrypted accordingly, it doesn’t matter if it gets leaked in any way or stolen by some rogue employee, so long as they do not have your master password. So yes, I’d say that’s a good idea.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      So all my passwords are locked behind a single password? Isnt this essentially the same as using the same password for every site. In that they only need to cracl o e password to have access to everything?

      • parpol@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The danger of using the same password everywhere is from leaks caused by poor security in one of those sites.

        Passwords getting leaked are almost always unrelated to how strong the passwords are and has more to do with how those password are stored, and what protection measures they have against unauthorized people accessing them.

        No one is ever going to “crack” your single password for your password manager as long as it is a strong password, though you might write it down in your wallet and lose it in a busy station, just like some administrator of a website might forget to close outside access to their mysql database containing unencrypted plaintext passwords.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just don’t use your master password anywhere else than your password manager.

        If your password manager only works offline, then it is impossible to leak on the internet.

      • baatliwala@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You should be safe as long as your master password isn’t small, less than 15 characters. The longer the password, the better. Personally what I do is use a pass phrase to make it easily memorable, and then use it as a base to inflate security somewhat artificially.

        Wrap the pass phrase around in brackets or symbols; mix lower/upper case; replace (or add to) a word in your pass phrase with one from a random other language, so instead of hello you type bonjour. Bonus points if you are able to replace even a few letters in your pass phrase with fancy diacritics, or fuck it add an emoji or two.

        Then again there are a LOT of other factors which go into security. Theoretically the lyrics of song are decent as a pass phrase but there’s not much point if everyone knows what your favourite song is, or if you are learning Spanish then you’ll replace the English words with Spanish.

        Unless you’re in a position where you’re targeted by nations or are working extremely high profile jobs like CEO or digital security you should be safe really with all these but as I said there’s a lot to keep in mind.

          • baatliwala@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            2FA is in the name, 2 factor authentication. A “factor” can be considered as proof that you are who you are. The more the factors provided, the more concrete proof the system has that the user is legitimate.

            What a factor is is a more complicated. It can be broadly put in 3 categories (there’s more but we’ll ignore for now) :

            • something you know, like a PIN/password
            • something you are, like biometrics/eye scanning
            • something you have, like an ATM card or phone

            The 2FA you are thinking of is probably the 1st (a password you know) + a PIN sent to or generated by something you have (a phone). If the 2nd pin was some you had created by memory like a password rather than a remote system generated one then it would be considered same as the first factor, it wouldn’t be multi factor.

            So yeah it’s important that you keep both factors as secure as possible. A good password + a phone to generate TOTPs. I mean theoretically you can keep a password of ABC and keep 2FA on so hackers wouldn’t be able to get into your system but let’s follow best practices yeah? Use a password generator to make complex passwords for a login and enable 2FA.

      • qqq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is not necessarily true.

        For example, consider the case of a 1Password vault falling into the hands of an attacker. They do not have the option to just crack your password, as the password is mixed with a randomly generated value to ultimately derive the key. They would need to simultaneously brute force your password and that random value. This should almost be impossible. However, given access to a client that already has knowledge of the secret value, it would fall back to brute forcing the password.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have been wondering as of lately, I’m an old Bitwarden user and I use their generated passwords which are just a random mess for my eye, anyway when a leak occurs I usually tend to type my known passwords to match it with the leak lists, but now all this being auto generated and I be totally clueless of which is which, how would I ever notice if one of those more secure passwords are leaked?

      Does Bitwarden let you know of leaked passwords as Chrome and I think Firefox does? Because I don’t recall having this info in hand.

      • smrtprts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You can go into your vault and choose a password to see if it’s been exposed on the web. It’s a little check mark by the password.

  • Goku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    It was literally a battle for me to have a strong unique password for our baby monitor… Wife was not happy about that but I came out on top.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’ve actually come up with a way to have a complex and unique password for each service which is also resilient againt forced password changes, doenst require a password manager, and if Im being tortured I still wont be able to tell them what it is because I dont know it unless Im at the login screen. If the service changes the layout of their login screen though, Im fucked.

  • clanginator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I came up with a formula for my passwords - as easy to remember as a single password and makes a unique login for every site feasible without a password manager. Can be updated as often as you like and all you gotta do is remember the latest version of the formula. At the very least, the hashes will be different and it’d take someone having more than two of my passwords to figure out the pattern.

    I also use over 100 email aliases with my own domain name so that my most important accounts have a separate login that isn’t a common domain that wouldn’t be easy for someone to guess.

    It would take a lot of concentrated effort for someone to get at any of my important accounts, and even my less important ones would be pretty difficult to get into even if multiple accounts are compromised, due to using a smaller pool of aliases under common domains for less important accounts.

    Someone got into half a dozen of my accounts a few years ago and I finally started taking security seriously.

  • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not really though. Once the password has been leaked, it needs to be cracked. And that usually doesn’t happen when the password is strong enough.

    Except the password wasn’t hashed but then the company belongs to get sued to bankruptcy

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Since you can never now for sure how a company handles hashing, always assume the worst. You will fare better.

    • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is a really bad take.

      The meme is expressing that a strong password is a lot worse when reused.

      Even if one agrees with your take, the meme is accurate.

      But your take is really bad because “it needs to be leaked and cracked” ignores so many alternative ways to steal passwords. Xxs keylogger, mitm, phishing… And some of these attacks are making it really difficult or unlikely to succeed. E.g. the chance of a phishing email for your bank or apple icloud is much more likely than a phishing email about e.g. your babyphone. Segregation of accounts is also important because obviously if you use the same password 30 times, then there are 30 places to leak your password and some might use md5.

      • newIdentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        But a strong password doesn’t help you with phishing attacks and such attacks. It really only protects you against database breaches and direct password Bruteforce.

        Reusing a password doesn’t destroy the whole security aspect you get from a strong password like the meme implies. Just some of it.

        Of course you should both not reuse passwords and use strong passwords

        • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          You have successfully missed my point, and apparently your own???

          I am not saying strong passwords are protecting you from phishing. I never did.

          The meme is saying reusing the password “ruins” a lot of the security benefits of a strong password. And it does. Like you agree.

          So for you, reusing passwords… That is what I am taking about, as you expressed the reusing passwords is fine because it has to be cracked and with strong password that is difficult. So I was criticizing your statement. I don’t know how you manage to understand anything else from it honestly. And yes!!! Reusing passwords makes phishing attacks easier and more successful.

  • ReaperWithASniper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This meme couldn’t explain it better - a strong password crumbles like a cardboard castle when used across multiple sites. Nails the message to the T.

  • BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    i use this on all sites:

    3 lower case 3 uppercase 3 special chars and 3 numbers, (pseudo) randomly arranged, (pseudo) randomly generated.

    • kase@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      How do you keep track of your passwords, if you don’t mind me asking? That’s where I get stuck

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m sure I’ll get shredded for this, but I keep my passwords in a notebook. Every once in a while I go through and change them all into other random nonsense and reorganize to keep it neat. I am a bit of a notebook fanatic and a have a whole shelf full of them. If someone ever broke into my house there’s no way they’re going through all of them to find anything like that. If the house burned down, maybe a bit of a problem, but as long as I have my phone I can get my email back, and between my phone and email I can get any of the important ones back as well.

        If I had corporate or government secrets and was the target of espionage I’d probably rethink, but the danger of anything is so minuscule.

        • orangeboats@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          To be fair: A notebook with a bunch of strong passwords is probably more secure than a human brain memorising a bunch of weak passwords.

      • LolaCat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        If you’re alright with an online password manager Bitwarden is the best one there is. If you prefer having an offline password manager KeePassXC is a great option as well :)

      • meliaesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        A password manager. I personally use 1Password, I’ve seen a lot of recommendations for BitWarden, and my workplace uses KeePass.

      • maniacal_gaff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Derive the pseudorandom parts somehow from the url domain and you’ll always be able to figure it out.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve done this and it has been convenient, but using a password manager is still the way to go IMO. The personal password algorithm approach starts to be a pain when you need to follow a different set of character rules or change a password. With a password manager there’s no hesitation or friction when considering a password change.

        • noride@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah, if you use your own password cipher, you never have to memorize a password again. Just derive it based on some common input value, like the company name or url. Makes password rotation tricky, though, and it’s a pain when a website won’t allow a special character you generally use, creating “one offs” that are hard to track.

          • atx_aquarian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I did this for years. Yep, it works enoughish, but I’m so much happier on a password manager now, and it’s pretty fun to see the managed passwords having so much more entropy than even the most obscure things I was algorithmically generating. Also, the speed of using a manager is great. Somehow I ended up with multiple Ticketmaster accounts (from using a different email address for some one-off season tickets that migrated into TM later). I think the moment I realized I wanted to change to a manager was when I was walking up to a concert and realized I hadn’t downloaded my ticket. I got into TM and realized I needed to switch accounts. So then I’m trying to walk and type my big fucky nerd-assed brain-generated password on mobile, fat-fingering the touchscreen keyboard, almost locking myself out of the account when I just want to get into the venue and relax. Later, that first moment trying an integrated pass manager and effortlessly switching between accounts, each with far stronger passes than I would have remembered, limited only by the loading speed of the site and with virtually zero chance of locking myself out… that really made me feel like fancy Pooh meme.

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just use engine model codes and body series# with special characters. Most of them are not even from the same vehicle so I doubt any one can remember. Shit sometimes I even forget what engine I coded with a certain vehicle. And then I get the you “can’t used the same password” which was enter previously to login.