• José Devezas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’re actually quite lucky to be called “Microslop” instead of what we used to call it back in the day…

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    people quickly started testing variations like “Microsl0p” to slip past the filter

    Why don’t they just use that AI they’re so fond of to cover this situation

  • brem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They probably already chose a new name.

    Probably something ass-hatted such as ‘Microhard’

    • lemmyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Microhard already exists, they are a radio module vendor in Canada. So presumably Microsoft will sue them to make them change their name.

  • decolo@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The intended takeaway is “Microsoft is getting less bad”, but I don’t think their brand reputation is salvageable by anything short of putting all C-levels in stocks on the front lawn in Redmond and a full repudiation of copilot/ai which obviously won’t happen.

  • toddestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    From what I’ve seen coming out of Redmond recently, it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that the “Microslop” filter broke with some random update as opposed to being intentionally disabled.