• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    WiFi 6e and 7 are legitimate competitors to standard 1gig Ethernet.

    In isolation, perhaps. Now cram 25 neighbors in high density housing in range with one another all using the same spectrum and see if that performance still is sustainable.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The newest specs have various flavors of MIMO and beam/null forming which helps cut down on co-channel interference. Having 8 antennas isn’t just a gimmick these days, which is pretty cool.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      6ghz wifi doesn’t go very far, you’ll almost never see 25 6ghz connections.

      At work I still get about 700 down with 25+ devices connected. There’s legitimately about 50 wifi connections despite being 30 floors up, but they’re all 2.4ghz which is worthless. Even 5ghz kinda sucks. But 6ghz? Rock solid.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The increase in frequency reduces signal penetration. Things like walls become major sources of signal attenuation. In open office plans, with no obstructive walls, no problem. In a house or apartment where you’re separated by multiple walls (and the materials/thickness those walls are made of) that can add up to significant signal loss.

        I haven’t personally tried any 6GHz wifi technologies. Have you used it in any places where you’re separated by obstructions from the access point?