The lone woman on Tennessee’s death row was still alive after she was administered two lethal injections, her lawyer said in a motion seeking to halt her execution Wednesday night, a stunning development after the Supreme Court had stepped in to allow the state to put her to death.

At 8:26 p.m. local time, witnesses said “executioners had injected both syringes of lethal injection chemicals” and Christa Pike was “still alive and snoring,” her lawyers said in a federal court filing.

They said Pike “has not lost consciousness and still has a heartbeat” and that curtains to the death chamber “have gone down twice.”

  • kurmudgeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This fiasco has been nothing but cruel and unusual punishment over and over again for this woman for a matter that should have been settled 30 years ago. Southern states make me sick - led by the “party of life” my ass. They don’t give a single shit about “life” once that person is born.

  • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    You’d think there’d be a sort of double-jeopardy thing in relation to lethal injections.

    Something like the old Western movie trope of how you can’t be hanged twice.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    State sanctioned murder is the most fucked up thing, except for state-sanctioned torture followed by murder.

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m against the death penalty because I think it debases our society, but I wouldn’t say we’re sociopaths. Have you read up on what this woman did? She tortured a girl for hours, bashed her skull in with a rock, then carried a piece of the skull in her pocket, showed it to friends and bragged about the murder.

      If she was a billionaire who opened up a datacenter, you all would be yelling “Botch it again!”

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        She tortured a girl for hours, bashed her skull in with a rock, then carried a piece of the skull in her pocket, showed it to friends and bragged about the murder

        Seems sociopathic.

        I also think this weird “tit for tat” obsession with what amounts to a medieval concept of justice is also sociopathic. That because someone has killed, that some how killing them undoes the initial injustice, well, its sociopathic. There is also ample evidence that it doesn’t accomplish any of is purported goals. A society, the response to a killing is to create more killing?

        Seems sociopathic.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Its a fundamentally reactionary tautology. Laws serves to protect but does not bind. Because I’m the one engaging in the behavior I have a problem with others doing, its fine.

        • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I totally agree with you on everything except for characterizing human desire for revenge and justice as sociopathy. Sure, it’s barbaric and beneath a civilized society, but they’re not the same.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t know what else to call it then, when a society collectively engages in a behavior we would individually characterize as sociopathic. And sure, there are degrees to these things, but the woman isn’t roaming the streets continuing to kill. She’s already behind bars and has been for decades. If you believe such a thing as justice exists, it was served long, long ago. Whatever this society is engaging in, its not justice, and its closer to what the accused did that it is to whatever could undo what the accused did.

  • halfpipe@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    So killing her doesn’t work, they bring an ambulance, take her to the hospital, let her go back to prison for a year and wait for them to try again?

    • FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It this point, IMO, they’ve shot their wad and should take her to the hospital and if she eventually survives all this then stop trying to kill her period and either re-incarcerate her for some period (even life) or let her go. Having the state try to kill her, twice, and fuck up the whole thing, twice, seems like ample punishment to me. Yee haw!

  • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been hearing for years that it’s very hard for the government to find qualified doctors who will work with them on this technology or help administer it, and that makes it extremely hard to carry out reliably. This is far from an isolated incident.

    • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The whole notion of lethal injections is the product of a sick and cowardly mentality in my view.

      I oppose the death penalty in general, but at least the gallows or the firing squad have the decency not to lie about what they are: the state violently ending someone’s life in cold blood. The lethal injection is a perverse inversion of medicine, it exists solely to protect the moral blushes of the pieces of crap who carry it out. Only a profoundly immoral political culture could invent something so blatantly perverted in my view. I particularly loathe the concept for this reason:

      If executions are gruesome enough the people who order them haven’t the stomach to pull the lever on the gallows, the correct response is to abolish the death penalty; not to sanitise it behind a ghastly pseudo-medical ritual which exists solely to allow those people to sleep at night. It is a coward’s way to have the death penalty without being considered cruel and despotic, but it is in reality among the most cruel and despotic forms of execution. If executions are to take place at all (and I think they should not) they should be very public, very swift, and very traditional so people are forced to see what the death penalty actually is.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    This feels like a “ball don’t lie” situation.

    Or, since the religious conservatives who love life also really like killing people, this is like God ordering a stay of execution.