• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m on fully on team Fuck AI.

    but this does amuse me, that him and his team couldnt even prevent the very predictable.

    Its like how musk spent a year trying to make Grok suck his dick, and it still calls him a nazi loser.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News’ catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.

      It’s currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I like the suggestion that they would include top secret documents in its training data. Although I wouldn’t be surprised from this administration.

  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It disagreeing with him across a wide variety of issues is how you know it’s at least passably intelligent.

    I figure it’s like Grok, if it’s not just actually Grok with a skin - Grok’s system instructions tell it to be neutral and fact-seeking without political bias but also to adopt certain right wing positions that aren’t. It’s why it keeps wavering between telling every eight winger that they’re an idiot and becoming Mecha-hitler - it can’t follow two contradictory goals so it prioritizes one and which one drifts.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Please please I really hope they will force US companies to start calling their chatbots SI instead of AI, and forbid them from using the term AI.

    That would be such a funny PR/marketing nightmare. It’s such a cringe term :D

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Q: What policies for work, health and environment help the most people and promotes a high quality of life index and freedom to try new work or care for loved ones, and why don’t they result in everyone quitting work? Is there enough wealth in the world to avoid artificial scarcity?

    I can help with official U.S. government services, benefits, and how-to information. I do not provide political commentary or economic analysis of policy choices.

    Lol fail

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    “Intelligence”, whether pre-tech or post-tech, has always been bigger than trump.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    As delusional as AI can be, they don’t even begin to approach the psychotic insanity of the child rapist and his magats.

    • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      At least AI hasn’t raped kids.

      Yes it has made child porn of them, but that’s because sick fucks asked it to.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Trump’s reaction was probably something along the lines of “shut up stupid piggy, you are stupid and fake, also ugly. I am going to call you pig intelligence from now on.”

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump calling it “Super Intelligence” only for the government’s own AI to contradict his election claims is almost too perfect. Apparently even a chatbot trained under his administration looked at the evidence and said: nope. Then came the inevitable upgrade: stop answering political questions before the machine commits any more inconvenient acts of fact checking.