I love how there’s continued bias confirmation that the main people who are crazy about privacy end up being right-wing shitheads.
Almost like if you irrationally care about privacy it usually means you have something to hide.
Now don’t get me wrong, I love my privacy too, but Jesus Christ people. It doesn’t mean we can’t ask for better but we are all using computers here. We are all on The Internet. There is no privacy. Stop lying to yourselves and saying there is.
You want privacy go in a locked room and talk to someone in person.
I like how librewolf has more green checks than brave but brave is shown first like it’s the best. really shows the biases of the authors
Edit: lmao hoisted by my own petard, it’s just in alphabetical order and I just hate brave. Tbf fuck Brendan Eich.
Mullvad seems to be the big winner, which I’m very torn about.
Mind educating us on this one? The Brave skepticism is well covered in the comments already but your take isn’t.
Its cofounder, Daniel Berntsson, funding far right political parties in Sweden with substantial amounts of money. So 🖕 him and 🖕 Mullvad.
I love how there’s continued bias confirmation that the main people who are crazy about privacy end up being right-wing shitheads.
Almost like if you irrationally care about privacy it usually means you have something to hide.
Now don’t get me wrong, I love my privacy too, but Jesus Christ people. It doesn’t mean we can’t ask for better but we are all using computers here. We are all on The Internet. There is no privacy. Stop lying to yourselves and saying there is.
You want privacy go in a locked room and talk to someone in person.
Its basically an ad for Brave.
Perhaps they should have doctored the results so that it doesn’t seem that way.