You’re technically correct, but I still disagree with you on this. My reasoning is that I think the real story here is that meta has wormed its way out of being punished adequately, again.
This is where it becomes subjective. For some,Meta being “punished adequately” would mean the complete liquidation of the company and charges for executives in front of the International Criminal Court in the Hague for crimes against humanity.
A $25 billion award would be 41% of Meta’s annual profit. That is substantial!
You’re technically correct, but I still disagree with you on this. My reasoning is that I think the real story here is that meta has wormed its way out of being punished adequately, again.
This is where it becomes subjective. For some,Meta being “punished adequately” would mean the complete liquidation of the company and charges for executives in front of the International Criminal Court in the Hague for crimes against humanity.
A $25 billion award would be 41% of Meta’s annual profit. That is substantial!
At least it’s not just a slap on the wrist, but I like the sound of the first paragraph!
“You’re correct but you weren’t negative enough so I disagree”