• Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Metric is scientific, media units are relatable. 355 CC’s with a mass of roughly 360 kgs is hardly easy to visualize compared to 3 elephants on a scale next to a can of Dr Pepper.

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So, 12oz can contains 355mL, which is 355cm^3

    Okay so how much force is 3 baby elephants?

    Yes, I’d try to estimate the density.

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      A baby elephant weighs about 90 to 120 kg at birth. So the density would be in the ballpark of almost 1000 g/cm³, while the densest element on earth is osmium at 22.570 g/cm³. Seems odd to me

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Yeah, somebody fucked up the game of telephone.

        hey AP, we found a super dense chunk of rock orbiting mars.

        Channel 23 tim: hey I just saw a feed they had a super desnse chunk of rock orbiting Mars!

        Channel 23 Fred: God DMANNIT timmy, I done tol you that our viewers ain’t gonna put up with no science bullshit. Now you tell me straight up, how this is important. Is it big? Is it heavy? is it comin for earth?

        Channel 23 tim: it’s not very big, but it’s pretty heavy and it’s not coming for earth

        Channel 23 Fred: I ain’t wastin no time on in then. If you can’t give me a size I can understant and tell me how heavy it is so I know why it matters, you can’t post it.

        Channel 23 tim: It’s like a small car, and it weighs as much as a motorcycle.

        Channel 23 Fred: That ain’t gonna get people to watch shit, here, it’s the size of a pop can, and weighs as much as a F-250…

        Channel 23 Sally: You can’t just say it weighs as much as a Ford, they’re not sponsors. Let’s say it’s an elepnant.

        Channel 23 Fred: naw, too fucking big they won’t get it

        Channel 23 Sally: a baby elephant

        Channel 23 Fred: you gotta think bigger call it 3…

        Channel 23 tim: shipping it

  • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Y’all failed to realize that Americans are math, science, and just regular plain sorts of illiterate. So if you want them to understand anything, you have to give it to them in units they can physically see or common household objects.

    Just think of it as trying to explain a difficult concept to a toddler or maybe at best a six-year-old. That’s what it feels like talking to the American public.

    • SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      To be fair, that’s the level of education, that mainstream media outlets expect of the general population elsewhere, as well.

      Here in Germany, they reference things in bathtubs, football fields (read: soccer), and Saarlands.

  • Yesterday I searched for how much an acre is, only to find this: https://www.wagrown.com/what-does-an-acre-look-like

    1,584 potatoes
    The amount of potatoes needed to make a line from one end to the other end of an acre.

    And Wikipedia made it sound even funnier to me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acre

    It is traditionally defined as the area of one chain by one furlong (66 by 660 feet), which is exactly equal to 10 square chains, 1⁄640 of a square mile, 4,840 square yards, or 43,560 square feet, and approximately 4,047 m2, or about 40% of a hectare.

    Or with rods: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_(unit)

    The ‘perfect acre’ is a rectangular area of 43,560 square feet, bounded by sides 660 feet (a furlong) long and 66 feet (a chain) wide (220 yards by 22 yards) or, equivalently, 40 rods by 4 rods. An acre is therefore 160 square rods or 10 square chains.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Agreed, this seems like a 100% completely honest attempt to be a relatable reference and clearly has no humor injected into it at all.

        edit: 1 acre is equivalent to 4 ‘roods’ lmao that’s wonderful.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m confused.

    Not from the mass or size.

    But from exactly what it is doing to Mars?

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I use metric to hold papers down on my desk.

    If I have 10 papers, I add another metric.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    It’s not “Meteor the size of a Dr Pepper” but “A meteor The size of Dr Pepper” as in the whole company.

  • ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Most people probably know how big a pop can is, and understand that even baby elephants are pretty heavy. It gets the point across better than “A meteor with a volume of approximately one third of a litre and a mass of approximately 350 kilograms”.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      But it’s so ludicrous it doesn’t pass even the most basic smell test.

      What’s a baby elephant weight? 100lbs., right out my butt. (Google says 200 at birth.) You can’t pack 300lbs. of anything into a pop can. Nothing in this solar system.