• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So the good guys won but didn’t win hard enough for your tastes.

    Just take the W and have a nice night. Now there’s an opportunity for improvement, that’s a good thing.

    • obvs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Look at the United States.

      Joe Biden beat Trump in 2020.

      And remember the cheering, and the relief, and the way people felt on that day.

      Never forget that day.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Any good guy was long gone before the candidates were selected.

      Still, it’s better than Flavio winning.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Alas, “the least-worst candidate who had a plausible chance of winning” is generally the best outcome for most democracies.

        Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Or the “well he’s okay I guess”, in this case.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          He’s far from ok, though. Our democracy is dying, in large part because of him.

          He is just way less worse than that other guy.

          • Cricket [he/him]@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Our democracy is dying, in large part because of him.

            Can you please explain? I haven’t been following what’s been going on in Brazil very closely.

            • skaffi@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Lula has been mired in corruption charges out the wazoo. Now, it turns out that at least some of them were a result of a corrupt, right-wing judiciary colluding against him, so his initial conviction was rightly overturned. But he was facing a lot of charges, and they were not necessarily all made up. Regardless, they were all swept away, just like that, meaning he has neither been found guilty or innocent of most of the charges of corruption against him.

              Among all the people in as populous a country as Brazil, you’d think you’d be able to find a better candidate than an unpopular geriatric, who, rightly so or not, has had an incredulous amount of accusations of corruption against him.

              But even if Lula was the second-worst possible candidate in all of Brazil, he is still many, many orders of magnitude better than the candidate he ultimately ran and won against. There’s no comparison.