• acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    another big selling point of nuclear is it’s easy to drop in at old coal plants that already have grid connections ready to go.

    pretending today’s limitations are permanent is a strange way to plan tomorrow’s energy system.

    how long are you willing to wait for perfect energy storage?

    obviously battery tech will improve, but the point is we cannot afford to assume that problem will be solved 100%, meanwhile experiencing more and more irreversible damage to our environment. We need to put our eggs into all clean energy baskets to get off CO2 as soon as possible. Not whenever battery tech happens to be ready to handle everything.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      55 minutes ago

      “it’s easy to drop at a place that has grid connections”

      Funny, because solar or literally any other plant will also benefit from having existing connections, and all of them are easier and cheaper to build than nuclear.

      Nuclear is dead but for niche applications.

    • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nobody’s asking us to bet on miracle batteries: Wind and solar paired with storage are already cheaper than building new nuclear. Reusing a coal plant’s grid connection doesn’t magically make a reactor cheap or quick to build. If speed and CO2 matter, follow the numbers, not the nostalgia.