• eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Having enrichment facilities doesn’t mean controlling the entire nuclear fuel cycle:

    France still imports Russian enriched uranium and relies on Russia to convert and enrich recycled uranium. Longstanding contracts and missing European processing capacity explain why. Energy independence is clearly more complicated than owning uranium deposits.

    A reactor needs an industrial fuel supply chain, while wind and solar need no fuel imports once installed. Nobody can embargo the breeze. If energy independence is the goal, why treat fuel free generation as an afterthought?

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I feel like we have strayed too far away from my main point, solar doesn’t work when it is dark outside.

      It is dark for long streaches of time in the Nordics.

      When it is dark, we use more energy to heat and light our homes.

      Batteries can’t supply enough power during that time.

      Importing power is expensive.

      So domestic power generation it is, and since nuclear power is one of the most environmentally friendly power sources we have and will work in the dark, it makes sense to use it to complement renewables.

      • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There’s more than solar and batteries or nuclear. We need cheap reliable energy. And thankfully there’s plenty.