• ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    NASA does not need SpaceX. Never will. What NASA needs is for the rich white assholes in DC to stop fucking them over with predatory contractors for five goddamn minutes.

  • nadram@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    SpaceX needs NASA contacts now now than ever. The jerk’s AI business has been shoved into SpaceX, and that’s a money burning machine. Should NASA take one too many contracts away from SpaceX, the huge red numbers will come out.

  • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This result was inevitable the monent that the government decided to outsource their space exploration/scientific endeavors to a private company.

    You don’t need to be Cassandra to be able to recognize 100% predictable outcomes.

  • artifex@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Revoke launch licenses until NASA gets what they need. Export ban on company and tech. Nationalize launch assets if absolutely necessary. Or at least threaten these things. SpaceX needs starlink, the kind of AI revenue they’d otherwise need is never going to materialize. Force them to play ball.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Musk also desperately needs that starlink revenue to continue until he can merge Tesla and SpaceX to cover for dropping Tesla sales.

    • Kokesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And who will make these restrictions? Until someone shoots trump, that’s not going to happen. Hopefully it happens soon.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah that’ll happen. I’ll just stay standing while holding my breath until it does.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    NASA helped keep SpaceX alive when it couldn’t make payroll, then spent decades making it indispensable. Now Musk has discovered that launching AI servers pays better than launching astronauts. Outsourcing your space program to one billionaire was a bold leap for mankind, straight into a monopoly with rocket engines.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think it was intentional on NASA, Boeing couldn’t really deliver with starliner and SLS isn’t as good as they hoped either.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Both are failed companies, but Musk has more money on hand and can keep the lights on for longer.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 hours ago

        SLS is a congressionally mandated jobs program.

        NASA was forced to use existing shuttle infrastructure instead of developing new hardware with partners. If they had been given freedom, I’m sure we wouldn’t even need SpaceX for anything.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I need a comic of a man struggling to raise a child, then the child grows big and strong (roided up and addicted to debt) then punts the aging man off a cliff.

  • Scott@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The only reason I’ve been critical of NASA is because of their over reliance on that shit heel musk

  • zoloftt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Before SpaceX it was the ULA doing ALL launches. This is nothing new. Launch is expensive, and no one wants to pay the barrier to entry.

    • holy_scroller@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Exactly. NASA bankrolled SpaceX to break the ULA monopoly, and now they are also funding Blue Origin to break the SpaceX monopoly. Rinse and repeat forever.