The fact that this is mildly interesting, is a testament to the quality we are used to from cheap mass production.
Why should anybody care about this sort of minor defect? You’d rather they increase their waste just so you can get a “perfect” glass? Grocery stores do that with produce, throwing out tons of fine fruits and vegetables per years that picky customers won’t touch. And that’s only the stuff that gets sent to the store.
There’s holding companies accountable, and then there’s whatever you’re trying to do. Don’t let companies fleece you, but don’t be so prudish that something like this enrages you.
What? That would probably be my favorite glass if I got one like that. Being different makes it charming, and I don’t see it would have any bad influence on functionality.
Downvote for “enrage”. That comment is making a sensible remark and does not carry the slightest note of rage or such sentiments.
Not a problem, just my two cents as a dog on the internet. Have fun 👋
You think that’s what an “enraged” comment looks like?
No one said it’s a major problem, just that we’re used to such good quality even from cheap mass mfg that something like this is unusual.
Maybe I’m wrong, but I see the comment the other way - that we’re so accustomed to crap product that we’re only mildly infuriated at defects like this.
This is mildly interesting, not mildly infuriating.
Nah, we’re just mildly interested.
“Hmm, that’s interesting.” Is the sentiment.
I see the comment the other way
And what exactly is it that makes you see it like that? You are hallucinating. Why would I expect “perfect glasses” from “cheap mass production” as you claim?
You are hallucinating
Yup, I must be insane to interpret something in a way you don’t. 🙄 Have we really gone from treating chatbots like people to treating people like chatbots?
You are reading something into the text that is in no way indicated. That’s hallucinating.