Would there be a difference if we voting slowly, one by one?

  • Steve@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 天前

    If 8 billion humans displace 50 gallons each, thats 400 billion gallons. The volume of all oceans is about 1.5 billion cubic kilometers, which is 3.96258e20 gallons.

    Eh, I got tired of trying to do that math, but thats a big frickin difference. I dont think the sea level rise would be measurable.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 小时前

      Try metric, it is way easier. The change will be about 2mm, whatever that in elephant heights or whatever is.

      • apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 小时前

        How did you arrive at that number? It’s an entire SI prefix away from the estimate I got in a sibling comment, so I assume one of us has something wrong.

        Edit: oh I see your other comment with the working. I think you may have the density wrong; if a density of “1” is in kg/m³ it’s way off – the density of water and approximately-humans is usually given as 1 kg/Litre.

    • apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      50gal is quite generous; average adult weight estimate tops out around 80kg and that doesn’t account for children. Divided by approximate human density 1010kg/m³ gives 0.08m³ or around 21gal. Multiplying that by 8 billion humans and dividing by the ocean surface area of around 361000000 km² gives approximately… 1.8μm of sea level rise.

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 天前

        Hey that gives rise to a new shower thought. If you blended all humans and spread them out evenly across the earth, how many atoms thick would the layer of human be?