• Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a Demodex folliculorum and I’m currently dating a Demodex brevis so I’m somewhat of an expert. Our host is pretty gross and rarely showers which has made the real estate in this area really expensive. We’ve been trying to move to another host but the opportunity hasn’t come up yet. Anyway, to answer your question, we have scuba gear.

  • ALERT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish Lemmy would grow to the point when these Reddit moments of "I’m a dermatologist, and actually…” happen as usual as they happen on Reddit.

  • InDogYearsImDead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    As another user pointed out, most bacteria and other microscopic forms of life don’t really “breath” in the way we think of it. Often they just absorb oxygen from their surrounding environments.

    They can be washed away, killed by chlorine (pools), or killed by salt imbalance (ocean). However it’s really hard (read near impossible) to kill them all, and even if you did they exist in our environments naturally and from other humans as well as on things we’ve touched recently. So they repopulate quickly.

    There are some arguments that Sodium Laurel Sulfate kills “good” bacteria on our skin.

  • snailwizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not a microbiologist. However I do know that bacteria are pretty resilient, and most pathogens and parasites can live for at least a few hours outside of a host. Plus your skin is really not all that smooth at a microscopic level, there are all sorts of little nooks and crannies to hold onto.

    Drowning wouldn’t really be a concern for them, imo, but additives like chlorine are specifically meant to be disinfectants.

  • stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would expect the chlorine in a swimming pool or the salt content on the ocean to be a bigger problem for the microscopic life on our bodies.

  • MrClayman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t say I know the answer, but I do know that one of these bugs – Tardigrades – are extremely hard to kill. IIRC one was put into a vacuum and removed after some time. It was either completely fine right away or after a little while.

    If I had to give a guess to other things, some of them probably die, yes. Hopefully someone else who knows more will be able to give more information!

  • AndromedusGalacticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s what Chatgpt/google bard have to say:

    The answer is: not necessarily. Most of the bacteria on our skin are adapted to living in wet environments, so they will not suffocate. However, some bacteria may be washed away or killed by the chlorine in the pool.

    • CineMaddie@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are we relying on language models to answer questions. These things don’t really “know” anything right?

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one knows anything get over yourself buddy - it gave a correct answer way more polite than I ever could so who’s gonna complain

      • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t they pull from online sources? So it’s basically googling with extra steps and an unpredictable middleman

        • CineMaddie@lemmy.film
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would be right if they understood/knew what they were talking about. It’s more akin to really advanced autocorrect that sounds/reads like something the ai was trained on. So it sounds correct but really has 0 basis on truth other than “the model predicts a human would say X next”. Truth is rarely the goal of any of these machine learning language models afaik.

      • AndromedusGalacticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I’m aware. There were like 10 comments with no replies, so I thought it’d be fun to see what the Chatbot would say. I didn’t take its answer too seriously, but I knew people might be sensitive to the answer. It would have been unfair of me to not say that it was though. Now people can at least decide whether or not to discard the information by providing a “source”.