The Chinese government has built up the world’s largest known online disinformation operation and is using it to harass US residents, politicians, and businesses—at times threatening its targets with violence, a CNN review of court documents and public disclosures by social media companies has found.

The onslaught of attacks – often of a vile and deeply personal nature – is part of a well-organized, increasingly brazen Chinese government intimidation campaign targeting people in the United States, documents show.

The US State Department says the tactics are part of a broader multi-billion-dollar effort to shape the world’s information environment and silence critics of Beijing that has expanded under President Xi Jinping. On Wednesday, President Biden is due to meet Xi at a summit in San Francisco.

Victims face a barrage of tens of thousands of social media posts that call them traitors, dogs, and racist and homophobic slurs. They say it’s all part of an effort to drive them into a state of constant fear and paranoia.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, I did not.

    But then you admit you did:

    You assumed I was talking about certain individuals, I was talking about the general profession.

    The assumption was made because the article and op used the phrase to mean one thing but in your mind, without telling anyone, it meant something else.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You were the one that took phrases that the article and op used and changed their meaning

      But then you admit you did:

      You assumed I was talking about certain individuals, I was talking about the general profession.

      You’re being intellectually dishonest, and using a cheap debate tactic of deflection. You’re misrepresenting what I said.

      I was responding to a comment, and not the article. I was not contradicting the article, I was not referring to the article. You made the mistake of assuming I was, when I did not.

      It’s really simple, and something that every human being (including myself) on this planet has done at one point or another. Just say “Sorry, I assumed incorrectly,”, and be done with it.

      The irony is that it was a simple enough mistake, not worthy of the argument we’ve been having since.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re being intellectually dishonest,

        You refuse to see that you expect users to read you mind such that words mean only what you want them to mean.