- cross-posted to:
- linuxmemes@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- linuxmemes@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Snap is what finally forced me to explore the vast selection of distros. Mint Linux is working well for me. I do miss Plasma Desktop though.
Wonderfull + You are free to install Plasma on your Mint
I’ve done this, works great.
Love Mint
Linux beginner here. Whats snaps?
It’s a package format that bundles all required libraries, that way you don’t run into the issue with program A requiring library version <1.1 and program B requiring library >1.3.
It leads to larger binaries because these dependencies are bundled, but it solves the issue with old/minimally maintained software not working on new OS versions because they depend on an ancient version of libssl or something.
Snaps is Ubuntu/Canonicals proprietary package format which is mostly considered a worse alternative to flatpak (another package format) with no real advantages on desktops that Canonical is trying to force on users
Snaps are not a proprietary package format.
The backend is proprietary
The webserver that canonical uses to distribute other people’s snaps is, and that’s it. APKs aren’t proprietary just because Google runs the Play store.
If you don’t want to interact with canonical’s servers you can download the snap files from literally anywhere else and install them manually so you don’t have to touch a single line of non open source code.
Even if you do download the snaps from elsewhere you are still locked in with the Canonical repository for updates, with it being basically hard coded and with no alternatives. Even more, snaps are straight up a worst experience then flatpak with all their quirks like the loopback devices and the automatic updates.
Disable automatic updates then.
snap --helpIMO snaps were prematurely pushed but that’s about it - they were a worse experience like two years ago when canonical started pushing them and almost every app had some quirk due to the sandboxing, but they have improved to the point that I literally can’t remember the last time I encountered an issue with the snap version of a program (granted I only really use snaps when something isn’t available as a .deb or there is a conflict)
I started using ubuntu 2 years ago and its great. Just disable snaps. It’s like 5 commands (and you have to reinstall Firefox).
You stop snap store from running, disable it from restarting then set apt over snap store as default.
It’s not hard. I did it day 1 of using Linux. Plus there’s guides a plenty on how to do it.
If you are using Ubuntu and disabling snaps, might as well use something else. Snaps are basically the selling point of Ubuntu and any other distro based on it will provide a better experience if you don’t want them.
What about all the other pros of ubuntu?
Off the top of my head,
- their power management is better than any other distro for laptops.
- Their compatibility with WiFi drivers is better than many others, granted that’s not exclusive to ubuntu but it is a pro.
- theyre more up to date than debian but stable while actually coming with Wayland support unlike Mint. Timeshift is great tho, good thing it’s compatible with ubuntu.
- their community is much larger than many other distro so support is easier to find.
- it’s just not a bad distro. There’s not a lot of other distros that match its out-of-the-box experience.
Other distros are good. PopOS is good. I chose Ubuntu mostly because it’s solid and stable but also because it has a wide community for help. I’m just getting tired of the narrative that ubuntu is totally crippled by its snaps. This is a linux distro, if I don’t like something I get to change it, which is actually cool. This isn’t windows where I have no control. Also, with snaps gone, I’ve literally never had a problem I haven’t caused. I have the approach of strip out what I don’t want. Arch users install what they do want. At the end of the day, we both are exploiting software we want to use to be productive. If I found myself fighting the os (like Mac or Windows) I’d switch but I don’t so I won’t.
At that point just use PopOS. Why the hell would you use Ubuntu just to disable snaps?
Because snaps aren’t the only feature the distro comes with. It’s widely versatile, commonly used, and this argument isn’t a good one. PopOS is good, so is ubuntu minus the snaps.
Why did you disable snaps on the first day of using Linux?
That sentence should probably read “on my first day of using Linux outside of a vm on bare metal with an installation I intended to keep”. I use Kali for security work and I used Manjaro once but it killed itself before I knew what I was doing.
Snaps are not very space efficient, I don’t need the same packages installed multiple times. In a desktop use case that’s a lot of repeating packages.
I think you’re gonna have a bad time since that’s essentially what all the newer formats do (flatpak, snap, appimage).
“I am more like a flatpak guy myself”
sudo apt purge -y snapd && sudo apt install -y gnome-software-plugin-flatpak && flatpak remote-add flathub https://flathub.org/repo/flathub.flatpakrepo
For everything else Fedora is looking good. PopOS has potential.
Why does everyone hate snaps? I mainly just use Ubuntu for work, but snaps seemed to work well enough.
Cause Snap is proprietary and the repo is controlled only by Canonical/Ubuntu. Flatpack on the other hand allows for third parry repos. And then one might even preference a classical install because ironically its snappier - faster - especially on oldee setups
But you can install multiple app stores, right? This is just one. My understanding is that it also adds sandboxing to any snaps you installed.
Snaps have sandboxing but only on Ubuntu I think. Flatpaks have sandboxing too but that should work in every distro.
Snap is not proprietary.
The snapcraft webserver backend is closed source but everything snap adjacent that touches your computer is open source, and you can distribute snaps and install them without using the snap store
They are 1. Slow on launch and on boot. 2. Very opaque and offer little control. 3. They don’t integrate well. 4. Proprietary. 5. Probably most importantly, Canonical has made 0 progress and demonstrated 0 interest in improving issues 1-4.
The apt package of KeePassXC would fail repeatedly to recognize my hardware token. The snap package ironically works like a charm.
You can just choose not to use it. They still release everything through their regular repositories for now.
FOR NOW
What the did with Firefox is a war crime…
BUT, the other day I had to instal DBeaver and using snap was for sure the easiest/fastest way
I don’t get it
The joke is based on the fact that Ubuntu forces snaps and most people agree that they suck
I don’t know how they suck and didn’t use them. I install everything either from ebuilds or build myself.
Snaps are great.
