SoccerGod@fanaticus.social to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoI hate chromiumfanaticus.socialimagemessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down151
arrow-up11.01Karrow-down1imageI hate chromiumfanaticus.socialSoccerGod@fanaticus.social to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square133fedilink
minus-squareSupervisor194@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoNo, dynamic content should absolutely be able to be delivered through the open Web, not just through walled gardens. Apps are almost universally shit.
minus-squaresmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoNo problem with sending some JavaScript module extending browser’s capability. But the problem I see is sending whole sites this way, sometimes even rendering HTML on the visitor’s browser, yack…
No, dynamic content should absolutely be able to be delivered through the open Web, not just through walled gardens. Apps are almost universally shit.
No problem with sending some JavaScript module extending browser’s capability. But the problem I see is sending whole sites this way, sometimes even rendering HTML on the visitor’s browser, yack…