Oxnvat@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoWayland vs X11 be likelemmy.worldimagemessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up1167arrow-down119
arrow-up1148arrow-down1imageWayland vs X11 be likelemmy.worldOxnvat@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squaremlg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·11 months agostupid old man rant: spoiler KDE making random features only available on wayland for no reason like trackpad gestures because memes GNOME being GNOME which is being useless anyway And literally everyone else is still using X11 by default, unless you count the 20 random github compositors that no one uses. I would switch to wayland if it had any actual immediate benefit, especially in performance, but as far as I have tested it doesn’t. Will probably join it in 2030 when the xfce devs wake up from their eternal slumber and make an update for it
minus-squaredukk@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoUsed Wayland, tried Hyprland. Was cool, somewhat buggy. Switched to XMonad. No more issues. Wayland is probably the future, but I just want something that works now.
stupid old man rant:
spoiler
KDE making random features only available on wayland for no reason like trackpad gestures because memes
GNOME being GNOME which is being useless anyway
And literally everyone else is still using X11 by default, unless you count the 20 random github compositors that no one uses.
I would switch to wayland if it had any actual immediate benefit, especially in performance, but as far as I have tested it doesn’t.
Will probably join it in 2030 when the xfce devs wake up from their eternal slumber and make an update for it
Used Wayland, tried Hyprland. Was cool, somewhat buggy.
Switched to XMonad. No more issues.
Wayland is probably the future, but I just want something that works now.