"Defaults by Chinese borrowers have surged to a record high since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, highlighting the depth of the country’s economic downturn and the obstacles to a full recovery,” the Financial Times reports.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      Comparing numbers between drasticly different countries rarely makes sense. Americas rates work for America, china’s rates work for China.

      What is important is that its changing from what it has historically been comfortable at.

      • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        China’s system has a potential duality:

        Everyone from the top to the bottom plays along when the pie is expanding, and endemic corruption can be treated as a predictable cost of doing business.

        However, when the pie stops growing, there isn’t the level of contract assurance that other rich countries offer. The Pareto optimal competition between powerful interests once growth fully stalls will be very interesting to watch. Xi will have his hands full, picking winners and losers, and lots of billionaires and centimillionaires will head for the door, taking significant capital with them. Worse, foreign investment will tail off, and decreased predictability will cause foreign companies to look hard at production in other places. At the bottom of the economic ladder, corruption will be much more apparent and challenging.

        Xi’s bet seems to be that he can use technological repression tools to manage discontent in a downturn. We’ll see; he may be right. If the Stasi had had access to Palantir, Israeli spy software, and Chinese hardware, Checkpoint Charlie might still be in place.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      if their accounting was trustworthy they wouldnt be in this situation.

      • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        China reminds me of people who cheat at video games and forget how much that makes up their playstyle when they go over to someone else’s house and can’t cheat.

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m missing comments, including my own so replying correctly is a but difficult. I want to say thanks for all the interesting comments, and it is definitely not as black and white as I thought!

  • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    What’s funny - and worrying - is that China holds about a trillion of US debt. Imagine if they would start demanding that money back, that’s the kind of thing that starts world wars.

    • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      10 months ago

      I see this a lot online, but I have to ask - where are people even getting exposure to any lending with a full call at any time option by the lender? Like all my personal debt has defined payment terms, just cause the bank might like the money back sooner, they can’t come to me and demand a full repayment in any circumstances.

      Why would people expect this for government debt? (this all ignores that the US didn’t go to China and ask for a loan, China bought treasuries on the open market - it’s like owning bonds, not being a bank).

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s not how that works. Bonds cannot just be asked back like that, they mature over a standard set of time. All you can do is try to sell them to other countries.

      And if you do, you’re just going to drive down the cost of US debt, the Fed will have to increase interest rates so that people buy from the fed instead. Basically all they’re going to be able to do is put a lower bound on American interest rates.

      That would be bad, but at the end of the day if the US government needs to fund itself it can still print money.

      Also a fire sale on US debt means they have to actually trade it for something. That would create a massive correction in the Chinese economy as there surplus of excess capital and trade turns into a huge deficit, all the factory jobs disappear, American manufacturing booms, and they get the value of what they’ve produced over the last 20 years that since on the dollar as they fire sell the United States bonds.

      Lose lose lose lose lose. I would happily encourage the Chinese to try to do this.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      its in US treasuries. if they try to sell them all at once the value would tank. they would have to sell in small pieces at a time to capture the value.

    • Remmock@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Everyone seems to fail to realize that for every dollar of US debt that China owns, we own $2 of China’s national debt. Trying to pull that carpet would be a gigantic mess for them.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The “good” news is that our debt has a built in fuse breaker (and China knows it). Most of the country’s dept is owned by us because when you pay into Social Security, the excess funds are used to buy US debt (as its considered the most stable investment there is). So we can always repay any one foreign debt holder, no matter how large, if congress just passes a bill to starve a bunch of seniors and people on disability.

    • Rapidcreek@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, but it’s theoretically good investment they have. It would be the last to go and not all at once.