Speedy thing goes in, speedy thing comes out.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yay I can’t wait for Comcast to implement this so you can blow through your 1.2 TB data cap in a second so they can charge you $10 per every 50 GB that it goes over.

    • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      11 months ago

      It still shocks me that they cap usage. There is no reason at all to do this. Why are they doing it?

      • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Their network is under provisioned. They sell an apartment building 300mbps connections to all 8 tenants, but only have a 1Gb connection. To make sure that link isn’t always saturated, they impose a data cap to make you not want to use the bandwidth you’re paying for. On top of that everyone’s connection is crippled during hours like the evening when everyone is using it. As a bonus, they can sell you cable TV on top, so you don’t hit your data cap watching shows.

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Because businesses exist to make money, so they have to balance charging as much money to the customers as they can without losing them to a competitive company. That used to mean that they had to treat customers with respect and make them want to stay with the business, but now they’ve realized that they can just pay lawmakers to let them have a monopoly, allowing them to charge as much money to the customers as they want without worrying that they’ll leave, since there’s either no competition for them to leave to, or the competition is using the same strategy, so leaving wouldn’t fix anything anyway. Free market, baby!

      • wmassingham@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        ISP shittiness aside, ISPs do actually pay for Internet backbone access by the byte. Usually there are peering agreements saying “you take 1tb of traffic from us, and we’ll take 1tb of traffic from you”, whether that traffic is destined for one of their customers (someone on Comcast scrolling Instagram), or they’re just providing the link to the next major node (Comcast being the link between AT&T’s segment of the US backbone and Big Mike’s Internet out in podunk Nebraska).

        And normally that works pretty well, until power users start moving huge amounts of data and unbalancing the traffic.

    • random65837@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      And that’s why I have FiOS even though I despise Verizon, and could save some money with Comcast.

  • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    For those wanting a bit of a summary.

    transmitting up to 22.9 petabits per second (Pb/s) through a single optic cable composed of multiple fibers

    The breakthrough isn’t things moving faster but more fibers per cable. So you can transfer more bits in parallel.

    That’s still a good breakthrough because, for lots of reasons, packing more fibers in isn’t as straight forward as one would think.

  • Fraylor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    This’ll bring their fax machines up to the current century for sure.

  • thiccckk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    What’s the use of high speed when videos are pixeleted 😅😅😅😅😅

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      haha the joke is porn haha guys get it i have a porn addiction look at me ahahhaahha

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was wondering that, too. Was it the emojis or projection? Throwing this one in my “small mysteries of the universe” bin

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Actually Wall Street intentionally increases their latency

      Some guy figured out that trades were getting sniped due to some locations having more latency than others relative to the trade location, so he developed a solution that intentionally lags the connection on different wires so that everyone gets their trade updates simultaneously and can’t snipe each other to up the prices on other people’s buys.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is just what I need for my goal of backing up both the Internet Archive and Wikipedia on local storage every day.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you really are, then you should be doing daily incrementals and fulls every couple of weeks. I can’t imagine the incrementals for those are more than a few dozen GB, but I guess I’m not familiar with the size of Internet Archive.

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes, but the fiber has become an issue. They’re doing QAM signaling in fiber now.

    • ThankYouVeryMuch@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nope, if we are talking about the actual speed of the signal optical fiber is relatively slow at ~1/3 c, compared to air or copper where it’s almost c. They’re using ‘speed’ meaning bandwidth. A van full of sd cards would have a massive bandwidth, but a very slow actual speed

      • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        We don’t. The measure is bits/s, which is a speed because it’s measured relative to time. 1 TB is a volume/amount, 1TB/s is a speed.