• GVasco@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Moved to Fediverse to get away from the data hoarding and selling that those types of companies partake in. Really hope most instances will defederate from threads and prevent Meta from collecting more data.

    • nero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only thing they can collect (as long as you aren’t on their services) are the things that are available for the entire world to see. So your comments, usernames etc. are already visible and they won’t get any of your personal data as that’s not known except to your instances admins.

    • axtualdave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Negative. Zuckerberg is an actual human, not a quasi sentient conglomerate composed of experimental AI platforms developed by the US Air Force to explore alien worlds via the Stargate program.

  • Saturdaycat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just started the use the fediverse to get away from Meta (I have a somewhat active Instagram) and Reddit.

    Now unfortunately my userbase is going to threads without knowing what it even is. I’m trying to spread awareness about the fediverse but it’s like yelling into the void. I signed up for threads and will continue to try to post content about the fediverse, but I also have to have an audience to share my art to as I’m trying to build some interest for a game I’m making.

    This really sucks. I feel extremely upset about this whole meta thing. I could continue to try to build from scratch, but I am hoping to release the game next year and I already have 3 years head start on Instagram, it feels bad to also just abandon what I’ve worked hard on.

    I dunno, I’m just venting. I hate Meta. I don’t even have a actual Facebook account. Hell I didn’t know Facebook owned Instagram until a year in.

    I’ll just try to continue to stay active on my fediverse accounts. And try to promote the fediverse on the centralized BS networks.

  • Roundcat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

    If Kbin or Lemmy allows them to federate with us, I’m out of here.

    • Onii-Chan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same. If kbin joins in, I’m gone. I haven’t been here long enough to give a fuck, but I do love it. I want kbin and Lemmy to make the right decision, but won’t think twice about leaving the second I see things taking an enshittified turn. Fuck off, Meta - nobody wants you here.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The beauty of this all is that you can just head to a different Kbin or Lemmy instance. There absolutely will be instances that refuse to federate with Meta.

    • linucs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I felt the same way but then I read this and changed my mind about it https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2023/07/what-to-know-about-threads/

      Thinking about it I’m in an European country where Whatsapp is the default messenger app, if it had interoperability I could be on another FOSS app and be tracked by Meta just when I talk to people who are on Whatsapp and be free when talking to people not on Whatsapp, this could be great to make people switch “clients”, which is damn hard now because “everyone is on Whatsapp”. Interoperability is the shit and we should embrace it!

    • aeroniero@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s nothing here to leave from in the first place, this place is pretty much empty at the moment. At least when a big player joins the fediverse it will bring users here and we will finally get decent content. The good thing about the fediverse is that the bad actors can just be defederated if things get too bad, unlike reddit for example.

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      If meta pushes this it will be to brand themselves with decentralized social media. The average person will associate the concept with meta and assume it was a meta invention. This may be a long play by meta to get in front of things like mastodon/lemmy/kbin/etc and become an established player in the space to the laymen before the actual established players can do so

      It’s a gross misuse of their obscene power bordering on monopoly and hardly a good thing. Even if the above isn’t true they will 100% use it to harvest as much data as humanly possible without consent and tons more if you’re stupid enough to give them consent. They will tune algorithms to feed people rage bait and stupid bullshit to drive engagement at all costs. And they’ll load it with intrusive targeted advertising

      Fuck meta

    • Poob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree, but I don’t think Facebook is going to openly promote the ability to choose instances or explain federated software. I’m pretty sure everything that makes the fediverse cool is going to be hidden from users.

      • nitneroc@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If this allows at least people to discover how the fediverse works (even if I doubt they will push people to it), it will be a great victory, because it’s the biggest pain for newcomers imo.

        Also the simple fact that the fediverse is mentioned will hopefully bring more people here.

    • curiosityLynx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t be getting familiar with the fediverse though. They’ll be getting familiar with Meta/Threads, as happened with Google Talk and XMPP.

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is you don’t want the kind of people Meta will bring here to be here. Also the fact that they’ll take all your info and sell it to every company and government on Earth.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It really needs to be considered that included in that group of “people Meta will bring here” is the vast majority of people’s real-world friends and family. And for better or for worse, a lot of people are going to want that, actually.

  • deleted@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d delete my account and join an instance that would defederate from corporations

  • meggied90@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some clever coding genius should host an instance for a bot they make that stays federated with everyone, and the entire point of the bot is to crawl across posts and anyone posting from Threads gets a nice public reply about why Threads is a toxic instance and they should switch to a non-Meta one immediately.

  • nefonous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can somebody explain me exactly how defederating them would give us a different outcome?

    I’m genuinely curious.

    Meta couldn’t give less fucks about 100k users on lemmy, they are targeting people that isn’t and will never use nor understand what the fediverse is.

    You keep them out, good. They don’t care, they just want to fill their own bucket with stuff that is outside anyway

    Twitter people going to threads is completely independent from anything in the fediverse. Those people won’t even notice any difference if they are federated or not.

    They are in for the brand and the fomo, not the content

    • tookmyname@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Defederation isn’t about punishing them. It’s about keeping their garbage off this platform, and keeping it separate.

      • nefonous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s good, but people are proposing it as a defense against an eventual EEE, that’s what I don’t get

  • autumn@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m also concerned about the potential for embrace/extend/extinguish, but searching for other fediverse users and posts is enough of a hurdle that threads might end up naturally staying a fairly separate instance.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I don’t think the fediverse is big enough for zuck to consider it a threat.