When I join threadiverse (summer 2023), soon everyone was talking about Threads and how it was about to destroy the whole thing.

Then nothing came of it and the whole convo kinda vanished.

Why didn’t threads destroy threadiverse already?

  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because Threads didn’t federate. It turns out when they said that they’ll federate, they actually meant “some time in the undisclosed future.” And then Threads lost a lot of that initial marketing hype so everyone forgot about it.

    Apparently Meta is currently testing federation for Threads, though? The problem about Threads federating isn’t resolved, to be entirely clear. It was merely that everyone, Meta included, just decided to kick the can down the road and think about the issue later.

    • DeadHorseX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also Threads is just incredibly corporate. There’s zero discoverability which means it’s all just celebrities and major news organisations, which isn’t a fun place to be for most people.

  • lapingvino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Threads still hasn’t actually fully connected with the fediverse, they are working on that, and until yesterday they weren’t live in Europe yet, so it wasn’t a real alternative for many people. That is changing drastically.

    This post sounds to me exactly like people’s reactions to Brexit. They were like “see, it’s not to bad” for the whole time when nothing was implemented yet. And then it actually went live, and everything went to shit. Keep an eye on when things actually go live the way they plan.

  • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    The issue was about threads implementing federation to connect to mastodon, lemmy and other networks that use that system. They did not implement it then, but said they would do it in the future. The topic has come up again because they announced they’re doing it now.

  • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Don’t think it was federated at first if that’s what you’re asking.

    It you’re asking why users didn’t migrate, probably because we like a forum experience rather than microblog following. I tried out bsky and it was a lot of pups. Like a lot. Like a pup fucking a pumpkin came up front page. I wouldn’t usually care, but it wasn’t marked suggestive.

    Anyway, probably because there’s no pups on threads.

    • density@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      a lot of pups

      I found there was too much cat stuff on threadiverse at first. I enjoy a cat in a box or a cat on a keyboard or “this is my life now” or even wearing a kitten as a hat here or there but the whole things was cats cats cats with arch linux memes mixed in.

      a pup fucking a pumpkin

      oh pups. lol.

  • gullible@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m curious about the resources required to federate with threads. It would utterly dwarf every other instance in every capacity, 1000fold. Wouldn’t this put a fair bit of financial pressure on every federated instance?

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I saw the word “survive” and for a second I thought we were talking about Threads, the postapocalyptic movie that scarred a generation.

    I need more coffee.

  • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Threads was a relatively bare-bones app when it launched. It didn’t have many of the features that users had come to expect from other social media apps, such as the ability to post photos or videos, or to add filters or stickers.

    • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I still wonder why they did that, like, what was the rush? Wasn’t like Twitter was all of a sudden going to be good again if they waited.

  • Froyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    With no “global delete” option, couldn’t users just poison the well with GDPR requests (Article 17: Right To Be Forgotten)?

    Instance owners “allegedly” run on charity and donation, so 4% of$0 is still $0.