• Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Less of a choice and more of a survival tactic. Plus, my foregone children would thank me.

    • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Those with higher income levels are the ones deciding to have less kids, whereas those with the lowest incomes are the ones having more. Source

      If people are being forced into not having children for economic reasons, wouldn’t it be the opposite?

      But I don’t disagree about it being in the best interest of my future children not to exist with the way things are heading lol.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If having kids causes you to be poorer what would the results look like?

        The reality is that the more kids you have the worse you are at capitalism: You can’t work as much, you can’t take on more demanding jobs and you’ll make life choices that are less lucrative to care for the kids.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yeah but you also don’t get trashed at the bars every weekend and you live longer healthier life. It isn’t as clear cut as you are making it. I agree being a dad has hurt parts of my career but it has probably helped other parts.

      • Eximius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        When contraception is expensive, career paths look bleak (or non-existent) and sex is the one fun activity you have… surprisedpikachu.jpg