Article seems pretty flawed. Relevance is a vague metric, and the author relies pretty heavily on data related to government site visitation, which seems subject to bias toward certain types of users.

Market share is likely still incredibly low, but Firefox’s relevance should be spiking right now due to Google’s shenanigans with Chromium. The fact that like 90% of revenue for its for-profit wing is from Google is still troubling.

Any alternative views out there?

  • rwhitisissle@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    1 year ago

    The day Firefox shutters its doors is the day the internet truly dies. Almost every “alternative” browser is chromium under the hood. Google’s next big plan is basically constructing a walled garden around the internet (at least the HTTP part) via complex DRM. Eventually, if you want to access an actual web page, it’ll have to be via a Chromium browser. Hell, even today a shitload of websites I visit on FF just don’t fucking render correctly and I’ll have to fire up a chromium instance just to access them. That’s only going to get worse with time.

    • Poggervania@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, you can argue that Google actually has a monopoly on web browsers right now. iirc Firefox takes a ton of money from Google, so if the choices are “Google’s proprietary browser” or “a non-Chromium browser backed by Google” (EDIT: unless you’re on Apple hardware and use Safari), then Google comes out on top either way.

      Wish we could get another good browser engine that isn’t Chromium, WebKit, or Quantum.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ehh

        There’s a clear difference between accepting money from an entity and letting it control things and make decisions. Pushing for a full and clear separation from any potential conflict of interest (while noble) is how projects die.

        I’d love for Firefox to be fully funded through small anonymous public donations in an ideal world. As it is, I don’t see an issue from taking Google’s money to do something that most users would want anyways.

        If the default search wasn’t google, I’m certain even more users would bail on Firefox. Anyone who does want an alternative search engine is capable of clicking on it during installation.

        • Jack@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          a full and clear separation from any potential conflict of interest (while noble) is how projects die.

          There are worse things than death, like being successful by screwing people over and/or making the biosphere unlivable.

      • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m still sad about the day the real Opera with the presto rendering engine died. And while Vivaldi is getting many of the features and functionality, it’s still a chromium rebuild. I guess it just takes too much money to build your own rendering engine anymore.

        • clgoh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess it just takes too much money to build your own rendering engine anymore.

          Even Microsoft couldn’t do it.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Heck even Google couldn’t do it, they used Apple’s WebKit. And even Apple couldn’t do it, they used KDE’s KHTML. Speaking of KHTML: Konqueror is still around, though they’ve already decided to get rid of KHTML completely and move to one of the forks, development pretty much stalled since 2016.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it was so fast, awww. And had a built-in BitTorrent client which didn’t suck balls and didn’t feel excessive.

          And all that caching.

      • Nate Cox@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m fighting the good fight by using Safari to browse and Kagi to search. I have effectively eliminated Google from my life and I could not be happier about it.

        Signed, a former Google fan who got tired of being the product for their ever shittier services.

    • Thymos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell, even today a shitload of websites I visit on FF just don’t fucking render correctly and I’ll have to fire up a chromium instance just to access them.

      Can you link to an example? I remember this from years ago, but haven’t encountered it for a long time.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. This is just a return to the days of the IE-only web. It will be problematic but it won’t be the end of the web.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It wasn’t really IE-only. People sort of could use Netscape, and then Mozilla, and then Firefox. And Opera which wasn’t free.