Apple is sending out checks for ‘batterygate’ class action claims::Apple has begun sending money to people whose iPhones were intentionally throttled in the iPhone 6, 6S, and 7 lines, as well as the first iPhone SE.

  • farcaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Can’t wait for the EU’s user-replaceable batteries regulation to take effect in 2027. Finally we can go back to what we used to have!

    • Alchemy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      How would this impact the phones water resistance, I wonder? A removable battery would require some sort of user serviceable (breakable) seal on the door.

      Maybe they could put the seal at the connection on the battery to the phone instead of around the door where it is likely to get debris lodged in it.

      • farcaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Good question. I imagine they could still make the internals of the phone waterproof. Getting your phone wet might destroy the battery but not the expensive phone. If they can make waterproof phones with USB-C ports which provide power then they should be able to make waterproof phones with a hidden “port” for the battery under a cover.

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I remember getting my first waterproof phone (Z), every port had a flap over it. The only exception was a special docking connector, that took +5v and gnd. And I thought (at the time) “that makes sense, all the other jacks probably can’t be waterproof”.

          Then 6 months later, I was handed the Z1, complete with waterproof 3.5mm jack.
          Another year later, the Z3 had a waterproof charging port too.

          It definitely feels like these things are gradually possible, if the manufacturer actually wants to achieve it.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The questionable OS update went out on Halloween in 2016 as an update to iOS 10, then the shit storm began, that battery replacement program started, etc.

      iOS 11 allowed people be notified about battery health problems and chose whether or not they wanted to throttle their CPU to preserve runtime.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, those are just generic anti Apple conspiracy theories.

      This all started with a bad batch of batteries in the iphone 6 or 6s.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Checks are apparently hitting the bank accounts of people affected by Apple’s decision to slow down iPhones with older batteries back in 2017.

    Indeed, the website set up for the settlement was updated in December to say the payments were expected to go out this month.

    The company wasn’t upfront about the purpose of the slowdown before this, but later said the goal was to keep phones from randomly shutting down once the battery degrades beyond a certain point.

    Multiple class action lawsuits cropped up, claiming the company’s actions drove people to upgrade early, rather than simply paying to have their phones’ battery replaced.

    The company agreed to the settlement in 2020, and in August last year, one of the law firms representing customers in the lawsuit said a judge had cleared the last obstacle — a legal appeal — holding up the payouts, and that money would be sent soon.

    At the time, the firm said that payments would be around $65, so if you filed an approved claim by October 6th, 2020, you may have a little more money than you expected coming your way soon.


    The original article contains 269 words, the summary contains 188 words. Saved 30%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Probably like $0.32 for affected customers, and millions for the lawyers who filed the class action suit.

    Total bullshit.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        They there was also the battery replacement program that happened when all this shit went down. For about 2 years they would do a battery swap for $30 on phones with poor battery health.

        Although I imagine a lot of folks just bought new phones.